NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/2762/2013

M/S. VISHVAS CONSTRUCTION CO. - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/S. KRISHNA AUTO SALES & ANR. - Opp.Party(s)

MR. DEVINDER PRATAP SINGH

03 Dec 2013

ORDER

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
REVISION PETITION NO. 2762 OF 2013
 
(Against the Order dated 22/04/2013 in Appeal No. 1692/2010 of the State Commission Punjab)
WITH
IA/4733/2013
1. M/S. VISHVAS CONSTRUCTION CO.
THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, NEEM WALI GALI
MANSA
PUNJAB
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. M/S. KRISHNA AUTO SALES & ANR.
THROUGH ITS PROP/PARTNER, G.T ROAD, DHANDHARI KALAN,
LUDHIANA
PUNJAB
2. M/S SKODA AUTO SALES INDIA PVT LTD,
THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, FIVE STAR SHENDRA INDUSTRIAL AREA, TQ AURANGABAD,
AURANGABAD - 431201
MAHARASTRA
...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. MALIK, PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. DR. S.M. KANTIKAR, MEMBER

For the Petitioner :
Mr. Devinder Pratap Singh, Advocate
For the Respondent :

Dated : 03 Dec 2013
ORDER
PER JUSTICE J.M. MALIK

 

1.      Counsel for the petitioner present.   Arguments heard.  The complainant Vishvas Construction Co. purchased a Skoda Laura Car from M/s Krishna Auto Sales, G.T. Road, Dhandhari Kalan, Ludhiana on 19.01.2007 by paying a sum of Rs. 15,94,750/-.  The car was manufactured by M/s Skoda Auto India Pvt. Ltd.-OP-2.  Thereafter, some defects cropped up in the car and the complaint was filed before the Mansa District Forum. 

2.      The District Forum has rightly held that Mansa District Forum has no jurisdiction to try this case.  However, counsel for the petitioner submits that he applied for Registration number from Mansa.  OP-1 has also given temporary certificate for District Forum, Mansa, therefore, cause of action arisen there.  We are unable to subscribe to the view of the petitioner’s counsel.  The defects in the car were seen when they had gone to Mussorie.   First, the District Forum has rightly held that Mansa District Forum has no jurisdiction.  Secondly, the case is barred by time.  The clutch plate of the car was broken in June 2007.  Thereafter, its A.C. became defective on 08.07.2008.  The complaint was filed on 22.02.2010.  The complaint was barred by time.  It should have been filed within two years. 

3.      However, if the complainant forgoes the claim of June 2007 and claims only the amount for the defective A.C. on 09.07.2008, then it can be partly within time.  Since Mansa District Forum has no jurisdiction to try this case, therefore, the application is returned to the petitioner and if he so desires, he can file part of the claim before the Ludhiana District Forum.  The time taken before the Consumer Fora, shall be deducted. 

4.      The Revision Petition stands disposed of.

 

 
......................J
J.M. MALIK
PRESIDING MEMBER
......................
DR. S.M. KANTIKAR
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.