Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

A/76/2019

Smt. S. Anupama Senthilnathan, - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s. Kirloskar Generator, And 3 others. - Opp.Party(s)

M/s. K. Semmalai

28 Feb 2023

ORDER

IN THE TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE          Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                           PRESIDENT

                      Thiru. R. VENKATESAPERUMAL                           MEMBER

 

F.A. No.76/2019

 

(Against the Order dt.30.01.2019 made in C.C. No.07/2018 on the file of

D.C.D.R.C., Nagapattinam)

DATED THE 28^TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023

 

Smt. S. Anupama Senthilnathan,

Proprietor,

M/s. K.S.N. Agency Dealer (BPCL),

Thirumullaivasal Road,

Sirkali.                                                                              .. Appellant / Complainant.

 

-Versus-

1. M/s. Kirloskar Generator,

Corporate Office,

Laxman Rao Kiroloskar Road,

Khadki,

Pune – 411 003,

Maharastra.       

 

2. Bharath Diesel Sales and Service,

No.25, 100 Feet Road,

Sundaraja Nagar,

Puducherry – 605 004.

 

3. Sri Annamalai Power Generator,

Administrative Office,

No.40, 9^th Cross,

Brindavanam, New Saram,

Pondicherry – 605 013.

 

4. Bharath Diesel Sales and Service,

Vasantham Complex,

KeezhaVeethi,

Thiruvizhanthur,

Mayiladuthurai.

 

 

Now at:-

Bharath Diesel Services and Sales,

No.1/6, R.R. Complex, 1^st Floor,

Bharathiar Street,

Nehru Nagar,

Karaikkal,

Puducherry – 609 602.                                           .. Respondents / Opposite parties.

 

Counsel for Appellant / Complainant                                       : M/s. K. Semmalai

Counsel for Respondents 1, 2 & 4 / Opposite parties 1, 2 & 4: M/s. R. Parthasarathy

3^rd Respondent / 3^rd Opposite party                                         : Served called absent

      

                This appeal coming up before us on 28.02.2023 for appearance of the appellant, for filing written arguments of the appellant and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal and this Commission made the following Order in open court:                                                                                                

 

Docket Order

 

Respondent Nos.1, 2 & 4 present.   No representation for the appellant.  

This appeal is posted today for appearance of the appellant, for filing written arguments of the appellant and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal. 

When the matter was called at 10.30 A.M., the appellant was not present.   Hence, passed over and called again at 01.00 P.M. still, there is no representation for the appellant.  Hence, we are of the view that keeping the appeal pending is of no use as the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case.

Hence, the appeal is dismissed for default.    No order as to costs.

 

               

                Sd/-                                                                                              Sd/-                                                                        

R.VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                                        R.SUBBIAH                       

             MEMBER                                                                                     PRESIDENT