Maharashtra

DCF, South Mumbai

96/2005

Mr.Jagdish.M.Juthani - Complainant(s)

Versus

Ms. Kanpur Bombay Transpor Company Regd - Opp.Party(s)

30 Mar 2011

ORDER

 
Complaint Case No. 96/2005
 
1. Mr.Jagdish.M.Juthani
Proper of roop rag Enterprises 126 134, nandlal jani Marg.dana bunder ,mambai 400 009
Mumbai-9
Maharashtra
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Ms. Kanpur Bombay Transpor Company Regd
53,solapur street,dana bunder masjid(E) Mumbai
Mumbai-9
Maharashtra
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  SHRI.S.B.DHUMAL. HONORABLE PRESIDENT
  Shri S.S. Patil , HONORABLE MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

              Complainant is absent. Ld.Advocate Mrs.S.D.Gandhi for Opposite Parties are present. On the last date of hearing the Complainant was absent. Hence, complaint is dismissed for default. No order as to cost.



 

 
 
[ SHRI.S.B.DHUMAL. HONORABLE]
PRESIDENT
 
[ Shri S.S. Patil , HONORABLE]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.