View 3726 Cases Against Railway
View 366 Cases Against Indian Railway
Satyender Anand filed a consumer case on 31 May 2018 against M/S. Indian Railway Welfare Organization in the New Delhi Consumer Court. The case no is CC/6/2015 and the judgment uploaded on 04 Jun 2018.
Case No.06/2015 Date: 31/05/2018 order
During the course of arguments, Son of the complainant has argued on the point of pecuniary jurisdiction, stating that the cost of the flat exceeds 20 Lacs i.e. Rs. 31,51,000/- as such, this Forum does not have Pecuniary Jurisdiction to entertain this complaint, in the light of Ambrish Kumar Shukla and Ors. Vs. Ferrous Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., Case no. 97 of 2016, decided by Hon’ble NCDRC on 07/10/2016. reported as Manu/CF/0499/16. During the course of arguments, it is admitted that cost of the flat/plot in question and reliefs claim exceeds the pecuniary jurisdiction of this Forum, i.e. Rs. 20 Lacs.
In view of the above, we are of the considered opinion that this Forum does not have the Pecuniary Jurisdiction to entertain the present complaint. Accordingly, the complaint be returned to the complainant along with annexures/ documents by retaining a copy of the same for records with liberty to file the same before the competent Forum as per the Law. The particulars in the light of the judgement of Hon’ble NCDRC in the matter of Tushar Batra & Anr. Vs. M/S Unitech Limited decided on 26/04/2017, Case no.-299 of 2014 are as follows.
Copy of the order be given Dasti to the parties.
Announced in open Forum on 31/05/2018.
The orders be uploaded on www.confonet.nic.in.
File be consigned to record room.
(ARUN KUMAR ARYA)
PRESIDENT
(NIPUR CHANDNA) (H M VYAS)
MEMBER MEMBER
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.