View 3726 Cases Against Railway
View 366 Cases Against Indian Railway
Vinod Kumar Srivastava filed a consumer case on 15 Jul 2019 against M/S. Indian Railway Board in the New Delhi Consumer Court. The case no is CC/435/2013 and the judgment uploaded on 26 Jul 2019.
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-VI
(DISTT. NEW DELHI), ‘M’ BLOCK, 1STFLOOR, VIKAS BHAWAN,
I.P.ESTATE, NEW DELHI-110002.
Case No.CC. 435/2013 Dated:
In the matter of:
Sh. Vinod Kumar Srivastava
R/o- House no. – A-44/A-4,
Shalimar Garden Extension-2
Sahibabad, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh …..…Complainant
Versus
The Chairman
Indian Railway Board
Indian Railways
Rail Bhawan, New Delhi ….… Opposite Party
ARUN KUMAR ARYA - PRESIDENT
O R D E R
The OP has moved an application for dismissal of complaint on the ground present complaint is barred by limitation stating that the complainant was travelling in the year 2009 from Lucknow return journey to New Delhi. It is further stated that the Railway Staff is not responsible for the loss of good because neither the goods were handed over to the railway for its safe custody nor the staff was aware about goods of the complainant. It is further stated that said contents/goods were neither booked nor declared before Railways & no amount was paid to Railway for said luggage/contents in question as per Sec. 100 of India Railway Act and Railway is not liable for any un-booking luggage. It is further stated that the complainant has filed this present complaint before this Forum in the year 2013 and the cause of action accrued in the year 2009, hence this complaint is barred by limitation.
2. Complainant has filed reply to the application in which it is stated that the District Forum, the State Commission or the National Commission shall not admit a complaint unless it is filed within 2 years from the date on which the cause of action arisen.
3. We have heard the arguments advanced at the Bar on the issue of limitation and have perused the record.
“ As per section 24(A) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 : -
“As a matter of law, the consumer forum must deal with the complaint on merit only if the complaint has been filed within two years from the date of accrual of cause of action and if beyond the said period, the sufficient cause has been shown and delay condoned for the reason recorded in writing. In other words, it is the duty of the consumer Fora to take notice of section 24 A and give effect to it.”
This final order be sent to server (www.confonet.nic.in ). A copy each of this order each be sent to both parties free of cost by post. File be consigned to Record Room.
Announced in open Forum on 15/07/2019
(ARUN KUMAR ARYA)
PRESIDENT
(NIPUR CHANDNA) (H.M. VYAS)
MEMBER MEMBER
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.