Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

CC/50/2014

R. Melvinraj, Rep. by his father and Natural Guardian, Raj Kumar - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s. Hitech Diagnostic Centre & anr. - Opp.Party(s)

T.R. Udhaya Kumar,

27 Feb 2019

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Complaint Case No. CC/50/2014
( Date of Filing : 21 Mar 2014 )
 
1. R. Melvinraj, Rep. by his father and Natural Guardian, Raj Kumar
C302, AKS SERENITY, AISHWARYA NAGAR, AYANAMBAKKAM, CHENNAI-600 095
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. M/s. Hitech Diagnostic Centre & anr.
AC-12, II AVENUE-IST FLOOR, ANNA NAGAR, CHENNAI-600 040
2. DR. GANESAN
CEO & MEDICAL DIRECTOR, HITECH DIAGNOSTIC CENTRE, AC-12, II AVENUE-IST FLOOR, ANNA NAGAR, CHENNAI-600 040
CHENNAI
TAMILNADU
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Dr. S. TAMILVANAN PRESIDENT
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 27 Feb 2019
Final Order / Judgement

IN THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

BEFORE    Hon’ble Dr. Justice S.TAMILVANAN              PRESIDENT

                Tmt.Dr. S.M.LATHAMAHESWARI                         MEMBER

 

CC.No. 50/2014

                                                          DATED THE 27TH   DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019

 

Master.R.Melvinraj (Minor)

Rep.by his father and natural guardian

Mr.Raj kumar,

S/o J.Gasparraj,

C302, AKS Serenity,

Aishwarya Nagar,

Ayanambakkam, Chennai 600 095                    ..complainant

                                            Vs

1.M/s Hitech Diagnostic Centre,

rep.by its C.E.O and Medical Director,

AC-12, II Avenue (1st floor)

Anna Nagar, Chennai 600 040

 

2. Dr.Ganesan, MBBS, DCP,

CEO & Medical Director

M/s Hitech Diagnostic Centre

AC-12, II Avenue (1st Floor)

Anna Nagar, Chennai 600 040                        ..opposite parties

 

Counsel for complainant                     : M/s T.R.Udhayakumar

Counsel for opposite parties 1 and 2    : M/s R.Devaprasad  

 

          This complaint coming on before us for hearing today, this commission made the following order in open court :-

 

                                             Docket order

          No representation for complainant. 1st and 2nd opposite parties present. This complaint is posted today for appearance of complainant and for filing proof affidavit of complainant or for dismissal. Complainant is being continuously absent from November 2017. Today also there is no representation for the complainant. Proof affidavit and written arguments of complainant not filed. Sufficient time granted. Complainant is also absent, thereby showing that the complainant is not interested in prosecuting the case. Therefore no useful purpose will be served in keeping the complaint on file. Hence the complaint is dismissed for default.

 

  Sd/-  xxxx                                                                                Sd/-xxxx

 S.M.LATHA MAHESWARI                                               S.TAMILVANAN

          MEMBER                                                                    PRESIDENT

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Dr. S. TAMILVANAN]
PRESIDENT

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.