NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/3629/2013

DHANNA SINGH - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/S. HEMSON'S COLD STORAGE PVT. LTD. - Opp.Party(s)

MR. YADAV NARENDER SINGH

09 Dec 2014

ORDER

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
REVISION PETITION NO. 1889 OF 2013
 
(Against the Order dated 05/02/2013 in Appeal No. 815/2008 of the State Commission Punjab)
1. M/S. HEMSON'S COLD STORAGE PVT. LTD.
THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR, SHRI HUKUM CHAND SINGLA, VILLAGE KAKKARWAL ?(DHURI) TEHSIL DHURI
SANGRUR
PUNJAB
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. DHANNA SINGH
S/O SH BALDEV SINGH, R/O VILLAGE UPPLI, TEHSIL
SANGRUR
PUNJAB
...........Respondent(s)
REVISION PETITION NO. 3629 OF 2013
 
(Against the Order dated 05/02/2013 in Appeal No. 815/2008 of the State Commission Punjab)
1. DHANNA SINGH
S/O SH BALDEV SINGH, R/O VILLAGE UPPLI, TEHSIL
SANGRUR
PUNJAB
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. M/S. HEMSON'S COLD STORAGE PVT. LTD.
VILLAGE KAKKARWAL(DHURI), TEHSIL DHURI, THROUGH ITS PARTNER/PROPRIETOR SHRI HUKUM CHANDSINGLA & SH.P.K SINGLA
DISTRICT : SANGRUR
PUNJAB
...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN, PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. VINAY KUMAR, MEMBER

For the Petitioner :
For the Cold Storage : Mr. R.M. Aggarwal, Advocate
For Mr. Dhanna Singh, Complainant : Mr. Narender Singh Yadav, Adv.
Mr. Abhishek Yadav, Advocate
For the Respondent :
For the Cold Storage : Mr. R.M. Aggarwal, Advocate
For Mr. Dhanna Singh, Complainant : Mr. Narender Singh Yadav, Adv.
Mr. Abhishek Yadav, Advocate

Dated : 09 Dec 2014
ORDER

          We have heard learned counsel for the parties for some time.

          We are happy to note that during the course of hearing, Counsel for both the parties have agreed for an amicable settlement of the dispute, giving rise to the present Revision Petitions.  According to the said settlement, the Complainant, namely, Mr. Dhanna Singh, will be entitled to receive a lump-sum amount of ₹75,000/- from the Opposite Party, in full and final settlement of his claim in his complaint.  It is stated that a sum of ₹26,500/- has already been received by the Complainant from the Opposite Party.

          In view of the above, we dispose of both the Revision Petitions with a direction that the Opposite Party shall pay to the Complainant a further sum of ₹48,500/- within two weeks from today.  On payment of the said amount, the complaint shall stand dismissed.  We clarify that the Opposite Party shall not be liable to deposit any amount in the Consumer Welfare Fund, as has been directed by the State Commission.

          Both the Revision Petitions stand disposed of in the above terms, with no order as to costs. 

 
......................J
D.K. JAIN
PRESIDENT
......................
VINAY KUMAR
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.