02.08.2021

ORDER

Mr. RAVISHANKAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER

1.        The appellant/complainant filed this appeal way back in the year 2012 being aggrieved by the Order dt.31.10.2012 passed in CC.No.2062/2011 on the file of 3^rd Additional District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bangalore wherein the District Commission has allowed the complaint by directing the Opposite Parties to service and effect repairs and maintenance to the car paring management system installed at the premises of the complainant as the complaint were made during the warranty period. 

2.        After filing this appeal, the appellant not appeared before this Commission inspite of giving sufficient opportunities to address his arguments and to convince how the impugned order passed by the District Commission is not satisfactory and against to law. 

3.        The case called twice, appellant not present.

4.        We have perused the appeal memo.  Mere memorandum of appeal is not sufficient to hold the appeal in the absence of any arguments and convincement by the appellant.  As such, the appeal requires to be dismissed.  Accordingly, appeal is dismissed.

Forward free copies to both parties.

             Sd/-                                                                   Sd/-

MEMBER                                                      JUDICIAL MEMBER

KCS*