West Bengal

Rajarhat

CC/174/2021

Ujjal Sannyal S/o Uttam Kumar Sanyal - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s. Evanie Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Mr. Tauhid Khan

05 Aug 2021

ORDER

Additional District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Rajarhat (New Town )
Kreta Suraksha Bhavan,Rajarhat(New Town),2nd Floor
Premises No. 38-0775, Plot No. AA-IID-31-3, New Town,P.S.-Eco Park,Kolkata - 700161
 
Complaint Case No. CC/174/2021
( Date of Filing : 27 Jul 2021 )
 
1. Ujjal Sannyal S/o Uttam Kumar Sanyal
Residing at 180/1, N.T Road, Padmabati Colony, Baidyabati, P.O- Baidyabati, P.S- Serampur, Dist- Hooghly , Pin No-712222.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. M/s. Evanie Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
594/1, Dakshindari Road , Bima Abasan Flat No. E2/1, 1st Floor, P.O- Sreebhumi, P.S- Lake Town Kolkata-700048.
2. Sri Supriya Kumar Patra, Director,
594/1, Dakshindari Road , Bima Abasan Flat No. E2/1, 1st Floor, P.O- Sreebhumi, P.S- Lake Town Kolkata-700048.
3. Mr. Avijit Dey, Director
594/1, Dakshindari Road , Bima Abasan Flat No. E2/1, 1st Floor, P.O- Sreebhumi, P.S- Lake Town Kolkata-700048.
4. Mr. Goutam Kumar Sahoo, Director,
594/1, Dakshindari Road , Bima Abasan Flat No. E2/1, 1st Floor, P.O- Sreebhumi, P.S- Lake Town Kolkata-700048.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Lakshmi Kanta Das PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Silpi Majumder MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 05 Aug 2021
Final Order / Judgement

Order  No. 01

            The Ld. Counsel for the complainant is present.

Today is fixed for hearing on the point of admissibility of this complaint.

At the time of hearing on the point of admission the Ld. Counsel for the complainant has submitted that this compliant is suffering from several defects, for which the complainant is inclined to ‘not press’ the petition of complaint and prays for liberty to file afresh after rectification o the said defects.

Accordingly the Ld. Counsel for the complainant has put endorsement as ‘not pressed’ in the front page of the petition of complaint.

We have perused the petition of complaint as well as endorsement of the Ld. Advocate for the complainant.

In our view as the complaint is suffering from several defects, prayer as made by the Ld. Advocate for the complainant is required to be allowed.

Accordingly, the petition of complaint CC/174/2021 is dismissed without being admitted as ‘not pressed’. There is no order as to costs.

As the petition of complaint is not admitted the complainant is at liberty to get return the copy of the complaint and other related documents as filed at the time of filing this complaint. For this purpose the complainant has to furnish a separate application before the appropriate authority of this Ld. Commission. The appropriate authority of this Ld. Commission is hereby directed to take immediate step so that the complainant can get return all the aforementioned without any further delay.

The complainant is also at liberty to approach before the appropriate Court/Commission for redressal of his/her dispute/grievance if not barred otherwise.

Let plain copy be given to the parties free of cost as per CPR.

 

Dictated and corrected by

 

[HON'BLE MRS. Silpi Majumder]
MEMBER

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Lakshmi Kanta Das]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Silpi Majumder]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.