Avnish Sachan filed a consumer case on 18 Jan 2011 against M/s. Education Division,Oracle India pvt ltd(Oracle university) Rep. by Ms. Anurekha B.S. in the Bangalore 2nd Additional Consumer Court. The case no is CC/2379/2010 and the judgment uploaded on 30 Nov -0001.
Karnataka
Bangalore 2nd Additional
CC/2379/2010
Avnish Sachan - Complainant(s)
Versus
M/s. Education Division,Oracle India pvt ltd(Oracle university) Rep. by Ms. Anurekha B.S. - Opp.Party(s)
M/s. Education Division,Oracle India pvt ltd(Oracle university) Rep. by Ms. Anurekha B.S.
...........Respondent(s)
BEFORE:
Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):
OppositeParty/Respondent(s):
OppositeParty/Respondent(s):
OppositeParty/Respondent(s):
ORDER
Complainant present. Opposite party called out absent. Notice served. Therefore, opposite party placed as ex-parte. 2. Perused the complaint and documents. 3. Heard the submissions of complainant. 4. The complainant submitted that he has paid Rs. 3,332/- through demand draft to the opposite party taken from Indian Overseas Bank on 05.01.2010. The complainant has produced bank slip to show that he has taken D.D. for Rs. 3,332/- in the name of opposite party. The representative of opposite party told complainant that he will receive e-mail regarding examination details within one week but complainant did not receive mail from the opposite party. The complainant came to know that the opposite party mis-spelled his name as Avinash Sachan instead of Avnish Sachan. The complainant submitted that he has correctly mentioned his name in the form and also in the bank slip. He requested the opposite party to correct the mistake and allow him to appear to the exam, but there is no response. He continuously tried to resolve the issue. But did not get the proper response. He was given invoice by the opposite party. By this invoice also it is clear that the opposite party has received Rs. 3,331.50 from the complainant for Oracle Certification Online course. The opposite party told the complainant that if the complainant may claim the amount if he is employee of any company. But the complainant submitted that he is unemployed, therefore, he could not claim the amount paid by him. Hence, he has approached this forum for direction to the opposite party to refund the amount paid by him. The case put up by the complainant has gone unchallenged. The opposite party has not appeared and contested the matter. It appears that opposite party has no defence to make. That is why it has not chosen to appear before this forum. The case of the complainant shall have to be accepted as true and correct. The opposite party shall have to be directed to refund Rs. 3,332/- to the complainant since, the opposite party has not given any service to the complainant as per promise. In the result I proceed to pass the following: ORDER 5. The complaint is allowed. The opposite party is directed to refund Rs. 3,332/- to the complainant within 30 days from the date of this order. 6. The opposite party is directed to send the amount by way of cheque / D.D. directly to the complainant with intimation to this forum. 7. Send the copy of this Order to both the parties free of costs immediately. 8. Pronounced in the Open Forum on this 07TH DAY OF JANUARY 2011. Order accordingly, PRESIDENT We concur the above findings. MEMBER MEMBER
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.