We are constrained to observe that despite our specific order dated 06.02.2017, wherein, taking note of the decision of the Larger Bench of this Commission in I (2017) CPJ 1 (NC), Ambrish Kumar Shukla & Ors. V. Ferrous Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., we had observed that since the cost of each flat along with the compensation claimed in respect thereof would not exceed ₹1.00 Crore, the Complaint in respect of the cause of action pleaded by the Complainant would be maintainable before the State Commission, the State Commission has dismissed the Complaint, filed by the Complainant in terms of the liberty granted by this Commission. It appears that the afore-noted confusion has arisen because the Complainant has filed a fresh Complaint, again clubbing the value of the two flats booked by him. Under the circumstances, while setting aside the said order, we permit the Complainant to file fresh Complaint in respect of each of the flats in question, within four weeks from today. It goes without saying that if the Complaints are filed within the time granted, the same shall be considered on their own merits, without reference to the period of limitation. The Complaint stands disposed of in the above terms. | 
