West Bengal

Rajarhat

CC/182/2020

Supriyo Das - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s. Dharitri Infraventure Pvt. Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Mr. Debasis Mitra

29 Sep 2022

ORDER

Additional District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Rajarhat (New Town )
Kreta Suraksha Bhavan,Rajarhat(New Town),2nd Floor
Premises No. 38-0775, Plot No. AA-IID-31-3, New Town,P.S.-Eco Park,Kolkata - 700161
 
Complaint Case No. CC/182/2020
( Date of Filing : 14 Aug 2020 )
 
1. Supriyo Das
Residing at flat No. 103J, kaziranga Apartment, Bye lane No.4 Ananda nagar, Panduport road, Guwahati-781012, Assam.
2. Bhaswati Das
Residing at flat No. 103J, kaziranga Apartment, Bye lane No.4 Ananda nagar, Panduport road, Guwahati-781012, Assam.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. M/s. Dharitri Infraventure Pvt. Ltd.
Resistered Office at Dn-51, Merlin Infinite 6th Floor, suite -606, Sector-V, Salt lake City, Kolkata-700091, P.s- Bidhannagar (East )
2. Suman Jana , S/o Tapan Kumar Jana , Director of Dharitri Infraventure Pvt. Ltd.
Residing at Rupnarayan pally, Village - Barbarisha, P.O- P.s- Kolaghat, Dist- east Midnapore , Pin- 721134.
3. Dipanwita Samanta W/o Suman Jana (Director of the Dharitiri Infraventure Pvt. Ltd.
Village Kouchandi, P.O- Amalhanda, P.S- Kolaghat, Dist- East Midnapore, Pin- 721134.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Lakshmi Kanta Das PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Partha Kumar Basu MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. Sagarika Sarkar MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 29 Sep 2022
Final Order / Judgement
  1. The complainants has filed this complaint under Section 35 of the CP Act against the Op (developer) seeking refund of the amount advanced by them under an agreement for purchasing a flat together with compensation of Rs. 10 lakh and cost of Rs. 1.3 lakh .
  1. The case of the complainants as unfolded in the complaint is that he entered into an agreement with the developers on 07.08.2017 for purchasing a flat of 900 sq.ft. at Rs. 24.7 lac in 'DIMITRA UNVERSIA' in Bhaganbanpur area in the District of 24 PGS (South). For that end he advanced Rs. 484000/- in between March 17 and June 2017 in six instalments and as per the terms of the said agreement he had to pay the balance amount in instalments within a period of 48 months commencing from on 07.08.2017. As per agreement the project was due to be completed within 48 months. But the OP intimated to the complainants under a letter dated  23.12.2017 that the construction work would begin in January 2018 and thereafter in December 2018 it was intimated that due to power grid issue and other land related issues they would not be able to complete the project. They also advised the complainants to submit the application for refund of money following which a letter was issued by the complainant on 13.12.2018 for refund. The OP promised to give back the money; but they did not keep the promise. This is why they have filed this case on 14.08.2020 for the reliefs stated above. 
  1. In response to the request of the complainants for refund, the Ops issued three cheques - (I) being number 163158 dated 08.08.2018 for Rs. 1,50,000/-. (ii) Cheque number 163156 dated 24.08.2018 for Rs. 2,00,000/- and (iii) cheque number 163157 dated 25.07.2011 for Rs. 1,50,000/-.
  1. But some of the cheques were dishonored and additional sum of Rs. 50,000/- was remitted by the Ops to the complainant's account. Consequently, the outstanding amount came to Rs. 3,22,500/-. The complainant has sought for refund of the said amount with interest, compensation and cost by filing this case.
  1. The case has been contested by the Op by filing WV.
  1. In support of his case, the complainants has filed the evidence on affidavit, money receipts, BNA and copies of cheques etc. Those documents appear to be fully consistent with the case of the complainants. It is not denied by the Ld. Advocate of the Ops while advancing argument at appropriate stage that a sum of Rs. 3,22,000/- still remains unpaid. In other words it is more or less an admitted fact that the complainants who advanced money for purchasing the flat does have a balance of Rs. 3,22,500/- at the credit. It is also an admitted fact that the “DIMITRA REALTORS housing project' did not see the light of the day, for which the complainants had to receive a serious jolt and had also suffer loss and agony.  The entitlement of the complainants to Rs. 3,22,500/-, as such,  cannot be ruled out on any ground what so ever.
  1. The payment of Rs. 5,22,500/- were made by the complainants during the period from 06.02.2017 to 15.07.2017. The complainants has started to put up with mental agony immediately after 15.07.2017. For nearly four years he had to bear loss of interest on Rs. 5,22,500/-. Such being the position, the volume of compensation to which the complainants may be entitled can be worked out at Rs. 75,000/-. He will also get Rs. 50,000/- on account of litigation cost.
  1. The Ops cannot shark off the responsibility for making payment of Rs. 3,22,500/- plus 75,000/- plus 50,000/-.
  1. Hence it is ordered :-

         that the case be and the same is allowed with cost of Rs. 50,000/-. The Ops will pay Rs. 3,22,500/- with interest @ 10% pa from 15.07.2017 within a period of 3 months hence, failing which the amount will accrue interest @ 12% pa. Ops will also pay Rs. 75,000/- plus 50,000/- totaling Rs. 1,25,000/- within a period of 3 months, failing which amount will accrue interest @ 12% pa.

Let a plain copy be given to the parties free of cost as per CPR.

 

Dictated and corrected by

 [HON'BLE MR. Lakshmi Kanta Das]
PRESIDENT

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Lakshmi Kanta Das]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Partha Kumar Basu]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Sagarika Sarkar]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.