NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/1083/2011

BRIJESH KOHLI - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/S. DALMIA RESORTS INTERNATIONAL P. LTD. - Opp.Party(s)

MR. SALIL PAUL

23 Sep 2011

ORDER

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
REVISION PETITION NO. 1082 OF 2011
 
(Against the Order dated 29/11/2010 in Appeal No. 3360/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)
1. URMILA GUPTA
C/o. M/s. Polyplastics, 0/15, Industrial Area, Jagadhri
Yamuna Nagar
Haryana
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. M/S. DALMIA RESORTS INTERNATIONAL P. LTD.
Through its Director V. Vekantraman, 4, Scindia House, Connaught Place
New Delhi
Delhi
...........Respondent(s)
REVISION PETITION NO. 1083 OF 2011
 
(Against the Order dated 29/11/2010 in Appeal No. 3361/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)
1. BRIJESH KOHLI
C/o. M/s. Umesh Ind. Entp. (P) Ltd., Near Bus Stand, Gobind Puri Road, Jagadhri
Yamuna Nagar
Haryana
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. M/S. DALMIA RESORTS INTERNATIONAL P. LTD.
Through its Director, V. Vekantraman,4, Scindia House, Connaught Place
New Delhi - 110001
Delhi
...........Respondent(s)
REVISION PETITION NO. 1084 OF 2011
 
(Against the Order dated 29/11/2010 in Appeal No. 3362/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)
1. ANKUSH KOHLI
C/o. M/s. Rama Rolling & General Mill., Court Road, Jagadhri
Yamuna Nagar
Haryana
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. M/S. DALMIA RESORTS INTERNATIONAL P. LTD.
Through its Director V. Vekantraman, 4, Scindia House, Connaught Place
New Delhi - 110001
Delhi
...........Respondent(s)
REVISION PETITION NO. 1085 OF 2011
 
(Against the Order dated 29/11/2010 in Appeal No. 3363/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)
1. KAMAL GUPTA
C/o. M/s. Polyplastics, 0/15, Industrial Area, Jagadhri
Yamuna Nagar
Haryana
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. M/S. DALMIA RESORTS INTERNATIONAL P. LTD.
Throgh its Director V. Vekantraman, 4, Scindia House, Connaught Place
New Delhi
Delhi
...........Respondent(s)
REVISION PETITION NO. 1086 OF 2011
 
(Against the Order dated 29/11/2010 in Appeal No. 3364/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)
1. DEEPAK KOHLI
C/o. M/s. Rama Rolling & General Mills, Court Road, jagadhri
Yamuna Nagar
Haryana
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. M/S. DALMIA RESORTS INTERNATIONAL P. LTD.
Through its Director V. Vekantraman, 4, Scindia House, Connaught Place
New Delhi - 110001
Delhi
...........Respondent(s)
REVISION PETITION NO. 1087 OF 2011
 
(Against the Order dated 29/11/2010 in Appeal No. 3365/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)
1. RAMAN KOHLI
C/o. M/s. Rama Rolling & General Mill, Court Road, Jagadhri
Yamuna Nagar
Haryana
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. M/S. DALMIA RESORTS INTERNATIONAL P. LTD.
Through its Director V. Vekantraman, 4, Scindia House, Connauht Place
New Delhi - 110001
Delhi
...........Respondent(s)
REVISION PETITION NO. 1088 OF 2011
 
(Against the Order dated 29/11/2010 in Appeal No. 3366/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)
1. GIRISH KOHLI
C/o. M/s. Shiv Shanker Metal Works, Old Court Road, Jagadhri
Yamuna Nagar
Haryana
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. M/S. DALMIA RESORTS INTERNATIONAL P. LTD.
Through its Director V. Vekantraman, 4, Scindia House, Connaught Place
New Delhi - 110001
Delhi
...........Respondent(s)
REVISION PETITION NO. 1089 OF 2011
 
(Against the Order dated 29/11/2010 in Appeal No. 3368/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)
1. GIRISH KOHLI
C/o. M/s. Shiv Shanker Metal Works, Old Court Road, Jagadhri
Yamuna Nagar
Haryana
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. M/S. DALMIA RESORTS INTERNATIONAL P. LTD.
Through its Director V. Vekantraman, 4, Scindia House, Connaught Place
New Delhi - 110001
Delhi
...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. R. KINGONKAR, PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. VINAY KUMAR, MEMBER

For the Petitioner :MR. SALIL PAUL
For the Respondent :MR. PAWAN KR. BAHL & HARISH KUMAR

Dated : 23 Sep 2011
ORDER

By consent of learned counsel for the parties, all the above petitions are being disposed of on following terms: i) The impugned order of the State Commission stands set aside and all the matters are remitted to the State Commission with direction to restore the appeals to the original positions. ii) The State Commission shall appreciate the evidence placed on record before the District Forum and shall have afresh look to the question of limitation as well as other questions involved in the appeals. iii) The first Appellate Court observed that despite of specific objections being raised, no finding was returned by the District Forum as regards the question of limitation. Now, such a finding can be rendered by the State Commission having regard to all the relevant aspects of the matter. iv) The parties to appear before the State Commission on 31.10.2011 and afresh notices to them shall not be necessary since the Counsel for the parties undertake to inform their respective clients about the date of hearing before the State Commission. The State Commission to expeditiously hear the appeals afresh keeping all the questions open for the purpose of decision. The petitions are accordingly disposed of. No costs.

 
......................J
V. R. KINGONKAR
PRESIDING MEMBER
......................
VINAY KUMAR
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.