IN THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI
BEFORE HON’BLE THIRU. JUSTICE R. SUBBIAH :: PRESIDENT
Tmt.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESWARI :: MEMBER
CC. No. 156/2018
DATED THE 31st DAY OF AUGUST 2021
1.Mr.M.Vijayakumar, aged 63 years
S/o Muthuswamy &
2. Mrs.V.Srilakshmi, aged 60 years,
W/o M.Vijayakumar,
Both residing at L-301,
Dakshin Homes, Gandhiji Road,
(Thayir Itteri Road), Rathinapuri post,
Coimbatore – 641 027 ..Complainants
Vs
1.M/s Dakshin Home Developers
By its Managing Partner Mr.R.R.ArunRaja,
E.No.A-103, Dakshin Homes,
Gandhiji Road, (Thayil Itteri)
Rathinapuri post, Coimbatore – 641 027
2. Mr.R.R.ArunRaja, aged about 60 years,
Managing Partner,
M/s Dakshin Home Developers
D.No.A, 103, Dakshin Homes,
Gandhiji Road, (Thayil Itteri)
Rathinapuri post, Coimbatore – 641 027
3. Mrs.A.Jamuna, aged about 55 years,
W/o R.R.ArunRaja,
D.No.A, 103, Dakshin Homes,
Gandhiji Road, (Thayil Itteri)
Rathinapuri post, Coimbatore – 641 027 ..Opposite parties
Counsel for Complainant : M/s R.Santhamoorthi
Counsel for opposite parties 1 to 3 : M/s Om Sai Ram
This complaint coming on before us for hearing today, this Commission made the following order in open court :
Docket order
No representation for both. Proof affidavit of complainant not filed.
This complaint is posted today for filing proof affidavit of complainant or for dismissal. The complaint is pending at the stage of filing proof affidavit from the year 2018. Previous hearing the complainant represented and prayed time for filing proof affidavit. At request of complainant the matter was adjourned to this day for filing proof affidavit or for dismissal. But today also there is no representation for the complainant. The absence of the complainant shows that the complainant is not interested in prosecuting the case. Therefore no useful purpose will be served in keeping the complaint on file. Hence the complaint is dismissed for default. No cost.
Sd/- Sd/-
S.M.LATHA MAHESWARI R. SUBBIAH
MEMBER PRESIDENT
