Telangana

Hyderabad

CC/48/2016

Yusuf Ahmed - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s. Country Vacations - Opp.Party(s)

Party in Person

11 Feb 2019

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM I HYDERABAD
(9th Floor, Chandravihar Complex, M.J. Road, Nampally, Hyderabad 500 001)
 
Complaint Case No. CC/48/2016
( Date of Filing : 23 Jan 2016 )
 
1. Yusuf Ahmed
S/o. Ejaz Ahmed, Age 26, R/o. 12-5-21, Flat No.302, Vijaypuri Colony, Tarnaka 500017
Secunderabad
Telangana
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. M/s. Country Vacations
Country Club, 6-3-1219, Begumpet, Hyderabad 500016
Hyderabad
Telangana
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. P. Vijender PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. D.Nirmala MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 11 Feb 2019
Final Order / Judgement

                                                                                        Date of Filing: 23-01-2016

                                                                                         Date of Order:11-02-2019

 

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM – I, HYDERABAD

 

P r e s e n t­

 

HON’BLE Sri P.VIJENDER, B.Sc. L.L.B.  PRESIDENT.

HON’BLE Smt. D.NIRMALA, B.Com., LLB., MEMBER

 

 

Monday, the  11th day of February, 2019

 

 

C.C.No.48 /2016

 

Between

Yusuf Ahmed,

Father’s name : Ejaz Ahmed,

Age 26 years, 12-5-21 flat No..302,

Vijayapuri colony, Tarnaka, Pin No.500 017

Ph No.88886504441

Cell No.(8886504441)                                                         ……Complainant

 

And

Country Vacations, Country Club,

6-3-1219, Begumpet, Hyderabad, Pin No.500 016

Phone No.04066135069,

040-40077886, 040-40271282                                          ….Opposite Party

 

Counsel for the complainant                :  Party in person

Counsel for the Opposite Party        :  Mr.V.V.G..Krishna

.                      

   

O R D E R

 

(By Sri P. Vijender, B.Sc., LL.B., President on behalf of the bench)

 

            This complaint has been preferred under Section 12 of C.P. Act of 1986 alleging unfair trade practice  on the part of the opposite parties  and seeking refund of Rs.40,000/- stated to have been  collected by the opposite  party with false  promises and misrepresentation. 

  1. Complainants case in brief is that when he went for a shopping   a person by name Archana called him informed that a draw will be conducted in  respect of vacation plan for 10 years. When he informed that he is not in a position  to  afford the same   the Manager of the opposite party  by  name Aamir came  and said that they will arrange  credit card  of  HDFC for paying the amount  by  easy EMI’s.  Later they have  collected  a sum of Rs.40,000/- as an advance and  will arrange the refund of the same after securing  credit card from HDFC for payment  of amount by 36 EMIs which will be in the range of Rs.600 to 700 per month.  It was also  informed that he can enjoy  club  facilities  and  vacations from next week itself.  They   have collected a sum of Rs.10,000/- which amount  was paid by the him by using his Kotak Credit Card. He paid  a further sum of Rs.30,000/- which was promised to give back after sanction of the    credit  card from  HDFC.  Later when he received credit card from HDFC  he tried to contact the  manager of the opposite party  but he was not available. Subsequent efforts made by him by personal  visit to Amrutha Castle the office off opposite party to meet the manager  no one helped him and he sat there for 6 hours  and came back  with frustration.  Later when he saw HDFC credit   card statement  he realized  that an amount of Rs.2,700 with interest  of Rs.600 is payable  per month.  The complainant has lot of burden hence tried to contact the  person in charge  of the opposite party    for refund of  the  amount.  When he went to Himayat Nagar branch  of opposite party    he learnt  that  it was shifted to Begumpet.  On some occasions he waited for 3 to 4 house at the office of the  opposite party     at Begumpet to meet  the Manager but could not meet him. 

       In the beginning he was informed by the executives of the opposite party     that he can utilize   the swimming pool, Gym facilities  in Amrutha Castle . On  one occasion he  and  his family members  went to  enjoy the weekend  of  but the   GYM  instructor of opposite party     told that  he cannot use to GYM or the swimming pool in Amrutha Castle and it shows that  false promises were made by the opposite party     in order to take membership  in the   opposite party   club and he was not able to use   facilities in the  Amrutha Castle.  On another occasion he went to use the club facilities  of the opposite party  at Begumpet to play  Billiards etcetera  was made to  wait  for 2 hours  and   even then he could not use it.   Whenever  he want to use the facilities of the opposite party   he was not permitted.   So till date he had not used the any of the club facility  of opposite party   or vacations offered by it.  Later in the month  of January 2015 he was called  to pay a sum of Rs.7,500/- as annual maintenance  charges which fact was not informed   to him earlier.  It was also informed that  if he fails to pay annual maintenance charges his membership will be   cancelled.  Hence he asked  to cancel the  membership  refund of the amount   and his efforts to get this amount was not succeeded  as the persons responsible in the opposite party informed that  the amount cannot be refunded.  Hence the present complaint.

  1. Opposite party filed   a detailed written version  explaining its status and various  facilities   offered to the members and holiday trips using  the facilities  provided by it and  its sister concern.  It is further stated  in  the written version  that on 12-09-2013 complainant became a member of the club by  entering into purchase agreement  and  club membership purchase agreement agreeing to pay a sum of Rs.1,10,000/- towards life membership for himself, his spouse and children under  the age of 25 years.  As per the terms and conditions of membership agreement the complainant can book accommodation in respect of studio blue season for a period of 6 nights and 7 days in a calendar year  for 10 years.  The complainant paid a sum of Rs.40,000/- and promised to pay the balance amount of Rs.70,000/-  but  it was not paid and there by committed breach of contract.  The amount of Rs.40,000/- paid towards part of membership fee is non-refundable   as per the terms and conditions of agreement signed by the complainant. The complainant was supposed to pay balance amount of membership fee within a period of 45 days after becoming  member otherwise the amount already paid will be forfeited.  Since the complainant has not paid balance amount in terms of purchase agreement  the amount already  paid by him was forfeited. 

         At the time of joining  as member the complainant was  explained by the executives of opposite party about the packages for utilizing the package for 10  years.  The complainant  voluntarily joined as  member and paid an amount of Rs.36,000/- through DD and agreed to pay balance amount in 45 days but failed.  The complainant having  failed to pay the balance amount became a defaulter and cannot alleged the deficiency of service on the part of the opposite party.  As per the terms and conditions of  purchase agreement the complainant has to pay Rs.7,500/- towards annual  membership fee every year. But same was also  not paid by the complainant.  No promise was made to the complainant  to provide 36 EMIs on HDFC card.  The allegation of the complainant  that he  and his family members were not permitted to use available facilities of opposite party at Begumpet is false. 

             Opposite party is a company registered  under the Companies Act 1956 and is one of the fastest growing  entertainment and leisure conglomerates  in  India. Complainant was aware of the terms and conditions of the membership agreement  before signing it.  Having  agreed to the said terms and conditions, the complainant is not entitled for refund of membership fee paid.  Complainant after signing the agreement  changed his mind in order to wringlet out  of the  agreement, addressed letter to the opposite party stating that  terms and conditions of the purchase agreement were  not explained to him.  There was no deficiency of service on the part of the opposite party and it is the complainant who failed to utilize the facilities provided by it.  Hence  the compliant is devoid of merits and liable to be dismissed. 

        In the enquiry the  complainant has  filed his evidence affidavit reiterating the  material allegations of the complaint  and in  support of  the same  he  got exhibited  4 documents.    Similarly for the  Opposite Party  evidence affidavits  of Sri C.M.Sridhar stated to be Assistant Manager of it is  filed  and through him got exhibited 2 documents.   Both sides have filed written arguments and supplemented the same with oral submissions. 

            Now point for consideration is :

  1. Whether the complainant is  entitled for refund of the amount paid towards part of membership  fee  with opposite party   ?
  2. To what relief?

Point No.1:  The complainant’s case  is  with false promises  he was made to sign the so called   purchase agreement  by the executives of the opposite party     at its Begumpet office by calling him there. The amount of Rs.10,000/- was collected  by using  Kotak credit card   and gave a cash payment of  Rs.30,000/-  as  membership fee and before signing  the membership agreement he convinced  that  the opposite party    will arrange a credit  card from HDFC   by which he can pay the amount of installments  and after paying of Rs.40,000/- he was also informed that after issuance of  credit card by HDFC the amount will be reimbursed to him but it has not happened.  It is also  his allegation that he was informed by the executives of opposite party that  he can utilize the facilities of  like Gym, Swimming pool and   other indoor games but when he went there on weekends  with family and children  they were informed that the GYM and swimming pool cannot used.  Then he realized that he was cheated by the executives of opposite party with false  promises  hence he  decided to cancel the membership by asking  the opposite party  to refund  an amount of Rs.40,000/- collected from him.  It is  also the complainant’s version  that at the beginning  he was not informed that  he  will be liable to pay Rs.7,500/- as annual membership  fee of the club irrespective of the fact whether he utilized the facilities  of club or  holiday packages.   On the other hand the stand of the opposite party   is the complainant having shown interest in its activities  voluntarily  came forward to join as member and paid Rs.40,000/- and singed on Ex.B2 membership  purchase agreement  promising to pay the balance  membership fee of Rs.70,000/- within  45 days  in terms of the said agreement but not paid it.  Hence in terms of  Ex.B2 purchase agreement Rs.40,000/- amount paid  initially  was forfeited.  The opposite party   also denied the complainant’s version of offering him to use the facilities at Begumpet location and that he was not informed  liable to pay  annual membership fee of Rs.7,500/-.  The document placed on record by both  sides are not  in dispute

           The defense of the opposite party is the amount of Rs.40,000/- paid by the complainant  towards part of membership fee cannot  be refunded  as per terms and conditions of agreement  because it is a concluded contract between the parties.  The complainant bound by the terms and conditions and cannot seek refund of the said amount.  If the stand of the opposite party   is to be taken into  consideration the opposite party   also entitled to recover the balance of amount of Rs.70,000/- from the complainant by instituting  a Civil suit because as terms of Ex.B2 agreement the complainant  is liable to pay Rs.70,000/- irrespective of the fact whether he utilized the facilities and packages offered by the opposite party. A reading of Ex.B2 the so called purchase  agreement  does not discloses  it is a concluded contract between the parties because the terms and conditions  incorporated  in it are one side infavour of the company. The opposite party   having  pleaded that it has got facilities  in number of countries  and franchises and agreement with other clubs to use the facilities  at different places has not placed any record to that  affect. In  the absence  of proof of the same by way of documentary evidence the self service  statement of the opposite party   cannot be taken into consideration.

             It is not in dispute so far the complainant  has not utilized any of the facilities  available  with opposite party  either at  Begumpet office and  any of the holiday  package tour.   The complainant also categorically stated that having regard to his income he cannot offer for a 10 days package of vacation at different locations.  In the light of it the opposite party    cannot be  allowed  to enrich itself with the hard earned money of common people like the complainant.  Ex.B2 is not  a conclude contract between the parties in spite of   the complainant  subscribing  the signature  the opposite party   cannot  shelter under it in order to  refuse to refund  the amount to the complainant.  So far the  opposite party   has not offered any of the service to the complainant hence it is liable to refund the entire amount with interest because the said amount has been utilized by the opposite party   for its business  activities in its  day to day activities.  Hence the  opposite party  shall refund the amount of Rs.40,000/- with  interest at 12% P.A from  3-3-2014 to the  date of payment.  The opposite party   by not refunding the amount at earliest  when demanded by the complainant has caused  mental agony hence  liable to pay a sum of Rs.15,000/- as compensation Accordingly the point is  answered infavour of the complainant.

Point No.2: In the result, the complaint is allowed in part directing the opposite party  

  1. To refund the amount of Rs.40,000/- with  interest at 12% P.A from  3-3-2014 to the  date of payment
  2. The  opposite party is further directed to pay a sum of Rs.15,000/- as compensation  and a sum of Rs.5,000/- towards costs of this complaint.   

Time for compliance  is  30 days from  the date of  service of this order

                        Dictated to steno transcribed and typed by her pronounced  by us on this the    11th  day of February , 2019

 

 

 

MEMBER                                                                                            PRESIDENT

 

 

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

 

PW1                                                                                                          DW1                                                

 

Yusuf Ahmed                                                                                 Sri C.M.Sridhar

 

 

 

 

 

Exs. filed on behalf of the Complainant:

Ex.A1ispurchase agreement  for club and Vacation membership

Ex.A2 is payment receipt

Ex.A3 is postal receipt

Ex.A4 is spa coupons

Exs. filed on behalf of the Opposite party

Ex.B1 is button up confirmation form

Ex.B2 is  a few facts  of the concept

 

 

 

MEMBER                                                                                            PRESIDENT

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. P. Vijender]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MRS. D.Nirmala]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.