View 110 Cases Against British Airways
Gurnam Arora filed a consumer case on 01 Jul 2019 against M/S. British Airways in the New Delhi Consumer Court. The case no is CC/1106/2010 and the judgment uploaded on 09 Jul 2019.
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-VI
(DISTT. NEW DELHI),
‘M’ BLOCK, 1STFLOOR, VIKAS BHAWAN, I.P.ESTATE,
NEW DELHI-110001
Case No.C.C./1106 /2010 Dated:
In the matter of:
Sh. Gurnam Arora (Joint Managing Director)
Kohinoor Foods Ltd.
201, Vipps Centre,
Masid Moth, Greater Kailash – II
New Delhi - 110048 …… Complainant
Versus
British Airways
(Through Managing Director)
DLF Qutab Plaza,
Gurgaon, Haryana
Also At:
DLF Centre
Sansad Marg
New Delhi- 110001 ……..Opposite Parties
H.M. VYAS – MEMBER
ORDER
The gist of the complaint is that the OP gave an advertisement offering discounts of 50% on all trips for travel in all booking classes in their first and club world cabins on the next trip from Indian online gateway to U.K., Europe and U.S.A. on the next trip from Indian online gateway to U.K., Europe and U.S.A. This offer was valid for three days i.e. 22nd May to 25th May 2009 and out bound travel were valid from 1st June till 30th September 2009. It is stated that the terms and condition of the offered mentioned that the change in date. A sum of Rs. 7,300/- was payable. The complainant booked their agent of the OP i.e. M/s Aman Travels on 23rd May, 2009 by paying a sum of Rs. 1,19,858/-. The entire cost of the tickets for out bound travel was paid on 19.09. 2009 and return journey on 27.09.2009. The complainant had to change his complaint or journey and as such approached the OP through travel agent itinerary change by paying additional cost of Rs. 7,300/- as per the terms and conditions. The OP in contravening of the terms and conditions of the offer refused the request of the OP to change the itinerary and demanded extra payment as per the prevailing price. The complainant had to go to USA for which complainant made several request to OP for changing the itinerary as per the terms and conditions but all efforts went in vain. In such circumstances and also the obstinate attitude and unprofessional behavior of OP and the complainant bought another ticket for USA from AIR FRANCE which cost him more than 2 lacs.
The persistent communications with Ms. Nepali Gandhi (Manager, India Trade Sales of the Opposite Party) right from the beginning continued but she communicated the complainant the complainant to fly under the offer of OP to late but by that time , the complainant has already purchased ticket of AIR FRANCE costing more than 2 lacs. The OP did not refund the amount without charging the penalty and as such email dated 23.12.2009 valid by legal notice dated 12.02.2010 and 05.05.2010 were sent . The omission and negligent behavior of the OP has been alleged, following prayer has been made :-
The OP filed written statement contesting the complaint. It is stated that the complaint cannot be adjudicated without adding the travel agent and it is also stated that complaint is liable to be dismissed for non-joinder of necessary parties. It is further admitted that the amount deducted by the OP is correct and there is not infirmity according to the terms and contract between the parties at the time of booking e-tickets. The OP has changed that the terms and conditions of the offer mentioned about change of date subject to payment of Rs. 7,300/- beyond the period of offer. All allegations have been changed and reliance has been made on the terms of offer regarding changes by both the parties.
Both the parties have filed their respective evidence by way of affidavit. The complainant has also moved an application under Section 340 read the Section 195(1)(B) CRPC and other Sections of IPC alleging false affidavit filing on behalf of the OP which is also pending . Both the parties are filed written submissions. The complainant also addressed oral arguments.
We have perused the material before us carefully and considered the submissions of the parties. The entire issue revolves upon the terms and conditions regarding change of itinerary/ date of tour. The relevant portion thereof is reproduced below.
Changes
Before Departure
Charge INR 7300/-
Rerouting/upgrading to any higher fare of cabin at charge of INR 7300 per transaction plus any difference in fare.
In case of Upgrade the original cancellation charge will apply if the upgraded ticket is subsequently cancelled.
When the new itinerary results in
A lower fare the INR 7300 change fee will apply and no refund will be made.
Charge applies to adult and children only
changes on day of departure or after no showing will be charged at INR 20000.
Original refund conditions apply to any upgraded ticket.
After Departure
Charge INR 7300.
Note –
Rerouting/upgrading to any higher fare of cabin at charge of INR 7300 per transaction plus any difference in fare.
Incase of Upgrade the original cancellation charge will apply if the upgraded ticket is subsequently cancelled.
When the new itinerary results in a lower fare the INR 7300 change fee will apply and no refund will be made.
Charge applies to adult and children only
Changes on day of departure or after no showing will be charged at INR 20000.
Original refund conditions apply to any upgraded ticket.
The undisputed facts are about the purchased of the tickets under the offer given by the OP. The offer was valid for three days only and the outbound tour was between 01.07.2009 and 31.09.2009. The complainant requested for change in itinerary by paying additional charges of Rs. 7300/-. through agent. The OP did not refund the entire amount but deducted the penalty under the aforesaid terms of the offer. Regarding changes in the date of journey/ itinerary the terms of the offer given by OP are unambiguous. It is categorically mentioned in the terms and conditions that charges before departure rerouting/upgrading to any higher fare of cabin at charge of INR 7300 per transaction plus any difference in fare. In case of Upgrade the original cancellation charge will apply if the upgraded ticket is subsequently cancelled. It is admitted position that the complainant opted for change and also purchased ticket of other Airlines.
Thus, in our considered view. The refund after the deduction deduction of the amount by the OP in such circumstances when the change requested by the complainant was beyond the said period of offer is justified. We do not find any deficiency on the part of OP the complaint is, therefore, dismissed with no orders as to cost. The complainant and the pending application are disposed off in above terms.
Copy of the order may be forwarded to the parties to the case free of cost as statutorily required.
Announced in open Forum on 01/07/2019
The orders be uploaded on www.confonet.nic.in
File be consigned to record room.
(ARUN KUMAR ARYA)
PRESIDENT
(NIPUR CHANDNA) (HM VYAS)
MEMBER MEMBER
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.