| Complaint Case No. CC/24/2021 | | ( Date of Filing : 22 Feb 2021 ) |
| | | | 1. Shashadhar Pradhan, aged about 36 years | | S/o. Pravakar Pradhan, At- Ghodamara, P.O- Wada, P.S- Soro, Dist- Balasore-756045. | | Odisha |
| ...........Complainant(s) | |
| Versus | | 1. M/s. Bisakha Agro, Ganeswarpur | | Januganj (Near Reliance Petrol Pump), Balasore-756019. | | Odisha | | 2. Mr Abimanu (Abhimanyu) Dhinda (Proprietor of M/s. Bisakha Agro) | | At- Shirakoli, P.O- Guruda, P.S- Remuna, Dist- Balasore-756019. | | Odisha | | 3. Authorized Officer, Zoomlion India Pvt. Ltd., Panvel | | Plot No.49, Panvel, Industrial Co. Op Estate Ltd., Panvel, Raigarh-410206. | | Maharashtra | | 4. Authorized Officer, Zoomlion Heavy Machinary Co. Ltd., Panvel | | Plot No.49, Panvel, Industrial Co. Op Estate Ltd., Panvel, Raigarh-410206. | | Maharashtra | | 5. Authorized Officer, Team Commotrade (India) Pvt. Ltd., Chennai | | 2A, Prince Apartment, 18/59, Ormes Road, Kiltauk, Chennai-600010. | | Tamilnadu | | 6. Shriram Transport Finance Company Ltd., Sahadevkhunta | | Near Canara Bank, 1st Floor, Pradhan Market Complex, Sahadev Khunta, Balasore-756001. | | Odisha |
| ............Opp.Party(s) |
|
|
| Final Order / Judgement | Advocate for the complainant is absent, no steps filed. Advocate for the O.Ps No.1 & 2 is also absent. Authorised representative for the O.P No.3 is absent. O.P No.5 is absent. Advocate for the O.P No.6 is also absent. On repeated calls, none respond on behalf of the complainant. Hence, hearing of the case could not be taken up. Perused the case record. In the present case, the O.Ps No.1 to 3 & 6 were appeared and filed their respective w/vs, but the w/vs filed by O.Ps No.1, 2 & 6 are not accepted. Further, as the notice against O.P No.5 was sufficient and he neither appeared nor filed w/v till yet, hence the O.P No.5 is set ex-parte. Since Advocate for the complainant has not filed fresh step against O.P No.4 till yet, hence the case against O.P No.4 is dismissed. As it appears from the case record that the complainant remained absent since 01.03.21 to till today except 17.11.21, for which hearing of the case impaired and the valuable time of this Commission is being wasted. In the above facts and circumstances of the case, it is presumed that the complainant has no interest to prosecute his own case. Considering the nature & conduct of the complainant, this Commission is of the view that the present case of the complainant should be dismissed. Accordingly, the complaint of the complainant is dismissed for non-prosecution of the case. The petition Dtd. 24.05.21 of O.P No.3 is also disposed of. | |
