Orissa

Baleshwar

CC/48/2020

Umakanta Sen, aged about 50 years - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s. Bisakha Agro, Ganeswarpur, Balasore - Opp.Party(s)

Sri Bijaya Kumar Behera & Associates

24 Sep 2024

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BALASORE
AT- KATCHERY HATA, NEAR COLLECTORATE, P.O, DIST- BALASORE-756001
 
Complaint Case No. CC/48/2020
( Date of Filing : 01 Dec 2020 )
 
1. Umakanta Sen, aged about 50 years
S/o. Tarani Sen, At- Uladi, P.O- Dakhinanadabani, P.S- Kamarda, Dist- Balasore-756035.
Odisha
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. M/s. Bisakha Agro, Ganeswarpur, Balasore
Januganj (Near Reliance Petrol Pump), P.S- Industrial, Balasore-756019.
Odisha
2. Mr Abimanu (Abhimanyu) Dhinda (Prop of M/s. Bisakha Agro)
At- Shirakoli, P.O- Guruda, P.S- Remuna, Dist- Balasore-756019.
Odisha
3. Authorized Officer, Zoomlion Heavy Machinery Co. Ltd., Panvel
Plot No.49, Panvel, Industrial Co. Op Estate Ltd., Panvel, Raigarh-410206.
Maharashtra
4. Authorized Officer, Team Commotrade (India) Pvt. Ltd., Chennai
2A, Prince Apartment, 18/59, Ormes Road, Kiltauk, Chennai-600010.
Tamil Nadu
5. Shriram Transport Finance Company Ltd., Sahadevkhunta
Near Canara Bank, 1st Floor, Pradhan Market Complex, Sahadev Khunta, Balasore-756001.
Odisha
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. NILAKANTHA PANDA PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. JIBAN KRUSHNA BEHERA MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 Sj. Raghunath Pradhan & Others, Advocate for the Opp. Party 0
 Sj. Raghunath Pradhan & Others, Advocate for the Opp. Party 0
Dated : 24 Sep 2024
Final Order / Judgement

                                         Advocate for the complainant is absent, no steps filed. Advocate for the O.Ps No.1 & 2 is present and files hazira. O.P No.4 is absent. Advocate for the O.P No.5 is also absent. On repeated calls, none respond on behalf of the complainant. Hence, hearing of the case could not be taken up. Perused the case record.

                                         In the present case, the O.Ps No.1, 2 & 5 were appeared and filed their respective w/vs and the O.P No.4 was set ex-parte. As it appears from the case record that the complainant remained absent since 27.05.21 till today except 07.12.21, for which hearing of the case impaired and the valuable time of this Commission is being wasted. Further, as Advocate for the complainant has not filed fresh step against O.P No.3 till yet, hence the case against O.P No.3 is dismissed. In the above facts and circumstances of the case, it is presumed that the complainant has no interest to prosecute his own case. Considering the nature & conduct of the complainant, this Commission is of the view that the present case of the complainant should be dismissed.   

                                         Accordingly, the complaint of the complainant is dismissed for non-prosecution of the case. The interim order, if any, passed against the O.Ps is treated to be infructuous.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. NILAKANTHA PANDA]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JIBAN KRUSHNA BEHERA]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.