| Complaint Case No. CC/40/2020 | | ( Date of Filing : 28 Oct 2020 ) |
| | | | 1. Srimanta Kumar Jena, aged about 56 years | | S/o. Gajendra Jena, At- Haladihata, P.O- Balimi, P.S- Kamarda, Dist- Balasore-756035. | | Odisha |
| ...........Complainant(s) | |
| Versus | | 1. M/s. Bisakha Agro, Ganeswarpur, Balasore | | Januganj (Near Reliance Petrol Pump), P.S- Industrial, Balasore-756019. | | Odisha | | 2. Mr Abimanu (Abhimanyu) Dhinda (Prop of M/s. Bisakha Agro) | | At- Shirakoli, P.O- Guruda, P.S- Remuna, Dist- Balasore-756019. | | Odisha | | 3. Authorized Officer, Zoomlion India Pvt. Ltd., Panvel | | Plot No.49, Panvel, Industrial Co. Op Estate Ltd., Panvel, Raigarh-410206. | | Maharashtra | | 4. Authorized Officer, Zoomlion Heavy Machinery Co. Ltd., Panvel | | Plot No.49, Panvel, Industrial Co. Op Estate Ltd., Panvel, Raigarh-410206. | | Maharashtra | | 5. Authorized Officer, Team Commotrade (India) Pvt. Ltd., Chennai | | 2A, Prince Apartment, 18/59, Ormes Road, Kiltauk, Chennai-600010. | | Tamil Nadu | | 6. Shriram Transport Finance Company Ltd., Sahadevkhunta | | Near Canara Bank, 1st Floor, Pradhan Market Complex, Sahadev Khunta, Balasore-756001. | | Odisha |
| ............Opp.Party(s) |
|
|
| Final Order / Judgement | The case is posted today, as yesterday was declared State Govt. holiday. Advocate for the complainant is absent, no steps filed. Advocate for the O.Ps No.1 & 2 is also absent. Authorised representative for the O.P No.3 is absent. Advocate for the O.P No.6 is also absent. On repeated calls, none respond on behalf of the complainant. Hence, hearing of the case could not be taken up. Perused the case record. In the present case, the O.Ps No.1 to 3 & 6 were appeared and filed their respective w/vs and the case against O.Ps No.4 & 5 was dismissed. As it appears from the case record that the complainant remained absent since 17.01.22 to till today, for which hearing of the case impaired and the valuable time of this Commission is being wasted. In the above facts and circumstances of the case, it is presumed that the complainant has no interest to prosecute his own case. Considering the nature & conduct of the complainant, this Commission is of the view that the present case of the complainant should be dismissed. Accordingly, the complaint of the complainant is dismissed for non-prosecution of the case. The interim order, if any, passed against the O.Ps is treated to be infructuous. The petition Dtd. 30.11.21 of O.P No.3 is also disposed of. | |
