| DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BALASORE | | AT- KATCHERY HATA, NEAR COLLECTORATE, P.O, DIST- BALASORE-756001 |
|
| |
| Complaint Case No. CC/49/2020 | | ( Date of Filing : 01 Dec 2020 ) |
| | | | 1. Gouri Rani Chand, aged about 28 years | | W/o. Kamal Kumar Chand, At/P.O- Kusuda, P.S- Kamarda, Dist- Balasore-756035. | | Odisha |
| ...........Complainant(s) | |
| Versus | | 1. M/s. Bisakha Agro, Ganeswarpur, Balasore | | Januganj (Near Reliance Petrol Pump), P.S- Industrial, Balasore-756019. | | Odisha | | 2. Mr Abimanu (Abhimanyu) Dhinda (Prop of M/s. Bisakha Agro) | | At- Shirakoli, P.O- Guruda, P.S- Remuna, Dist- Balasore-756019. | | Odisha | | 3. Authorized Officer, Zoomlion Heavy Machinery Co. Ltd., Panvel | | Plot No.49, Panvel, Industrial Co. Op Estate Ltd., Panvel, Raigarh-410206. | | Maharashtra | | 4. Authorized Officer, Team Commotrade (India) Pvt. Ltd., Chennai | | 2A, Prince Apartment, 18/59, Ormes Road, Kiltauk, Chennai-600010. | | Tamil Nadu | | 5. Shriram Transport Finance Company Ltd., Sahadevkhunta | | Near Canara Bank, 1st Floor, Pradhan Market Complex, Sahadev Khunta, Balasore-756001. | | Odisha |
| ............Opp.Party(s) |
|
|
| |
| BEFORE: | | | | HON'BLE MR. NILAKANTHA PANDA PRESIDENT | | | HON'BLE MR. JIBAN KRUSHNA BEHERA MEMBER | |
| |
| PRESENT: | | | Sj. Raghunath Pradhan & Others, Advocate for the Opp. Party 0 | | | Sj. Raghunath Pradhan & Others, Advocate for the Opp. Party 0 | |
| Dated : 24 Sep 2024 |
| Final Order / Judgement | Advocate for the complainant is absent, no steps filed. Advocate for the O.Ps No.1 & 2 is present and files hazira. O.P No.4 is absent. Advocate for the O.P No.5 is also absent. On repeated calls, none respond on behalf of the complainant. Hence, hearing of the case could not be taken up. Perused the case record. In the present case, the O.Ps No.1, 2 & 5 were appeared and filed their respective w/vs and the O.P No.4 was set ex-parte. As it appears from the case record that the complainant remained absent since 27.05.21 till today except 07.12.21, for which hearing of the case impaired and the valuable time of this Commission is being wasted. Further, as Advocate for the complainant has not filed fresh step against O.P No.3 till yet, hence the case against O.P No.3 is dismissed. In the above facts and circumstances of the case, it is presumed that the complainant has no interest to prosecute his own case. Considering the nature & conduct of the complainant, this Commission is of the view that the present case of the complainant should be dismissed. Accordingly, the complaint of the complainant is dismissed for non-prosecution of the case. The interim order, if any, passed against the O.Ps is treated to be infructuous. | |
| |
| | | [HON'BLE MR. NILAKANTHA PANDA] | PRESIDENT
| | | | | | [HON'BLE MR. JIBAN KRUSHNA BEHERA] | MEMBER
| | | |
