West Bengal

Kolkata-I(North)

EA/52/2018

Shri Indranil Mukherjee - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s. Berger Paints India Ltd. and another - Opp.Party(s)

Chittaranjan Sarkar

25 May 2018

ORDER

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kolkata - I (North)
8B, Nelie Sengupta Sarani, 4th Floor, Kolkata-700087.
Web-site - confonet.nic.in
 
Execution Application No. EA/52/2018
( Date of Filing : 27 Mar 2018 )
In
Complaint Case No. CC/14/244
 
1. Shri Indranil Mukherjee
S/o Basudev Mukherjee, Sriguruniloy, 31/14A, K. P. Mukherjee Road, P.S. - Haridevpur East Park, Kolkata - 700008.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. M/s. Berger Paints India Ltd. and another
129, Park Street, P.S. - Park Street, Kolkata - 700017.
2. Mr. Bhaskar Dasgupta, General Manager, M/s. Berger Paints India Pvt. Ltd.
100A & B, Kabi Sukanta Sarani, P.S. - Park Street, Kolkata - 700085.
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Sambhunath Chatterjee PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Sk. Abul Answar MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:
For the Respondent:
Dated : 25 May 2018
Final Order / Judgement

Order No.  2  dt.  25/05/2018

            The complainant by filing this MA application stated inter alia that this Forum was pleased to pass an order dt.22.4.14 to the effect that the o.ps. were directed to repaint of affected area. After receiving the said judgment the jdrs. Informed the complainant for repainting of the affected part, but dhr. made repainting of the entire wall with Asial Paints. Since the dhr. has not complied by allowing the jdrs. to repaint the affected part and claimed the compensation of Rs.1,32,885/- which is absolutely an imaginary amount claimed by the complainant / dhr. In view of the said fact ld. lawyer for jdrs. prayed for allowing the MA application since the dhr. has flouted the order of this Forum and there was no scope of the jdrs. to act in terms of the final order dt.26.6.17. On the basis of the said fact jdrs. prayed for dismissal of the execution case allowing the MA application.

            Ld. lawyer for dhr. submits that since dhr. has not complied the order, therefore the execution case had to be filed.

On perusal of the record we find that the order passed by this Forum was flouted by dhr. and filed the execution case claiming huge amount against the jdrs. Since the complainant / dhr. failed to act in terms of the order passed by this Forum and the claim made by dhr. is fabulous one which is beyond the scope of the order passed by this Forum, therefore, we hold that the execution case filed by the complainant / dhr. is based on false allegation made against the jdrs. Therefore the execution case filed by the complainant / dhr. is not maintainable and the same is dismissed accordingly.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sambhunath Chatterjee]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sk. Abul Answar]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.