Tamil Nadu

South Chennai

CC/435/2014

M/s.Sathiavannan - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s. Barath, Prop. Indian Electronics - Opp.Party(s)

M/s. Devaraj & Mahesh

25 Jan 2016

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,
CHENNAI (SOUTH)
 
Complaint Case No. CC/435/2014
 
1. M/s.Sathiavannan
25/10, III Main Road, K.B.Nagar, Adyar, Chn - 20.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. M/s. Barath, Prop. Indian Electronics
2/186, Periyar Road, Palavakkam, Chn - 41.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  B.RAMALINGAM., MA., ML., PRESIDENT
  Dr.Paul Rajasekaran.,M.A.,D.MIN,HRDI,AIII,BCS MEMBER
  K.AMALA., M.A., L.L.B., MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

                                                                        Date of Filing :   16.10.2014

                                                                        Date of Order :   25.01.2016

 

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM, CHENNAI(SOUTH)

     2nd Floor, Frazer Bridge Road, V.O.C.Nagar, Park Town, Chennai-3

 

PRESENT: THIRU. B. RAMALINGAM M.A.M.L.,                     : PRESIDENT

                 TMT. K.AMALA, M.A. L.L.B.,                                 : MEMBER I

                 DR. T.PAUL RAJASEKARAN, M.A PGDHRDI, AIII,BCS : MEMBER II

 

C.C.NO.435/2014

             MONDAY THIS  25TH  DAY OF JANUARY 2016     

 

Sathiavannan,

No.25/10, 3rd Main Road,

K.B. Nagar,

Adyar,

Chennai 600 020.                                         ..Complainant

                                      ..Vs..

 

Barath,

Prop. Indian Electronics,

No.8 Cross Stret,

Palavakkam,

Chennai  600 041.                                          ..Opposite party  

 

 

For the Complainant                   :   Mr. Devaraj & other     

 

For the  opposite party                :   Exparte

 

 

ORDER

 

THIRU. B. RAMALINGAM PRESIDENT

 

        Complaint under section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act 1986.  Complaint is filed seeking direction against  the opposite party  to pay a sum of Rs.90,000/- with interest and also to pay a sum of Rs.10,000/- as cost of the complaint to the complainant.   

1.     Even after receipt of the notice from this forum in this proceeding, the opposite party did not appear before this Forum and did not file any written version.  Hence the opposite party was  set exparte on 2.9.2015.    

2.     Perused the complaint, proof affidavit filed by the complainant and documents Ex.A1 to Ex.A5 filed on the side of the complainant and considered the complainant side argument.

3.     The complainant has stated that he has purchased  the Plasma TV for Rs.18,000/- under Ex.A1 on 22.4.2014 from the opposite party and the same was suffered repair on 8.4.2014.  So the said T.V. has been handed  over to the opposite party for repair, an advance amount of Rs.5,000/- towards repair charges paid by the complainant and the receipt Ex.A2 for the same issued by the opposite party.  Whereas in spite of several demands and legal notice Ex.A3 issued by the complainant to the opposite party dated 23.7.2014, the opposite party neither returned the said T.V. after repair nor replied for the notice.   As such the opposite party had committed deficiency of service.  As such the complainant has filed this complaint against the opposite party claiming a sum of Rs.90,000/- with interest and also to pay compensation and litigation charges.  

4.     On careful perusal of the complaint and the above said documents filed by the complainant  we find contradiction on the case of the complainant that the alleged bill Ex.A1 is not related to the complaint mentioned  TV said to have been handed over to the opposite party on 8.4.2014 under Ex.A2 receipt for repair because there is no evidence. Ex.A1 is not considered to be a valid bill in respect of the TV said to have been given for repair to the opposite party under Ex.A2, because the description of the TV in Ex.A1 is mentioned as Plama TV.  Whereas in Ex.A2 it is mentioned as LCD TV  and Ex.A1 did not bear any particulars of the said TV i.e. the making number etc.  Therefore we are of the considered view that the Ex.A1 is not the invoice or bill for the TV which has been handed over for repair to the opposite party on 8.4.2014 under Ex.A2.   However it is acceptable that the TV handed over by the complainant to the opposite party on 8.4.2014 under Ex.A2 with payment of Rs.5,000/- towards repair charges as advance has not been duly repaired by the opposite party and returned to the complainant inspite of several demands as well as notice Ex.A3 dated 23.7.2014 issued by the complainant to the opposite party.   As such the opposite party has committed deficiency of service and hardship to the complainant is acceptable.    Therefore  we  are  of  the considered view that the opposite party is directed to repair the said T.V. mentioned in Ex.A2 and to return the same to the complainant on receiving the necessary charges for repair after deducting a sum of Rs.5,000/- which has been paid as advance  under  Ex.A2  and  also  to  pay a sum of Rs.5,000/- as just and reasonable compensation  and  a sum of Rs.2,500/- as litigation charges to the complainant.  

In the result, the complaint is partly allowed.    The opposite party is directed to return the LCD TV  duly repaired received from the complainant for repair under Ex.A2 after receiving necessary charges for repair by deducting Rs.5,000/- which is paid in advance under Ex.A2 and also to pay a sum of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees five thousand only) as compensation and also to pay sum of Rs.2,500/- (Rupees Two thousand and five hundred only)  as cost of litigation  to the complainant within six weeks from the date of this order.

Dictated to the Assistant transcribed and typed by her corrected and pronounced by us on this the  25th  day  of  January   2016.

 

MEMBER-I                        MEMBER-II                             PRESIDENT.

Complainant’s side documents:

Ex.A1-  22.4.2014       - Copy of Purchase Bill.

Ex.A2- 8.4.2014  - Copy of Service receipt.

Ex.A3- 23.7.2014 - Copy of legal notice.

Ex.A4- 30.9.2014 - Copy of Postal receipt.

Ex.A5- 1.10.2014 – Copy of Ack. Card.

 

Opposite party’s Exhibits:-     Nil  (Exparte)

 

 

 

MEMBER-I                        MEMBER-II                             PRESIDENT.

 
 
[ B.RAMALINGAM., MA., ML.,]
PRESIDENT
 
[ Dr.Paul Rajasekaran.,M.A.,D.MIN,HRDI,AIII,BCS]
MEMBER
 
[ K.AMALA., M.A., L.L.B.,]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.