Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

A/276/2015

Haji S.Meera Mohideen - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s. Barakath Haj Service, Rep. by its Proprietor, Alhaj Y Buhari & anr. - Opp.Party(s)

K. Govi Ganesan

22 Feb 2022

ORDER

BEFORE THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE         Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                             PRESIDENT

                         Tmt. Dr. S. M. LATHA MAHESWARI                           MEMBER

 

F.A. No.276/2015

(Against the Order dt.29.07.2015 made in C.C. No.23/2012 on the file of

D.C.D.R.C., Chennai (North))

                         DATED THE 22^ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022

 

 

Haji S. Meera Mohideen,

S/o. Mr. S.M. Sulthan,

No.40/127, G.S.T. Road,

Maduranthagam,

Kanchipuram District.                                                       .. Appellant / Complainant.

-Versus-

1. M/s. Barakath Haj Service,

Represented by its Proprietor

Mr. Alhaj Y Buhari,

No.115/59, Moore Street,

Parrys,

Chennai – 600 001.

 

2. M/s. Jaharath Macca Haj Services,

Represented by its Proprietor

Mr. Abdul Hameed,

No.5, Semmarakadai Street,

Nagapattinam – 611 001.                                      .. Respondents / Opposite parties.

 

 Counsel for the Appellant / Complainant                  : M/s. K. Govi Ganesan

Counsel for the 1^st Respondent / 1^st Opposite party  : Ms. Arul Selvan Associates

2^nd Respondent / 2^nd Opposite party                          : P P effected

 

          This appeal coming up before us on 24.02.2022 for appearance of appellant and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal and this Commission made the following Order in open court:                                                                                                

 

 

Docket Order

 

1^st Respondent present. No representation for appellant.  This appeal is posted today for appearance of Appellant and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal.  When the matter was called at 10.30 A.M., the Appellant was not present. Hence,  passed over and  called again at 01.15 P.M. Still, there is no representation for the appellant.  Hence we are of the view that keeping the appeal pending is of no use as appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case.

Hence, the appeal is dismissed for default.  No order as to costs.

 

               

                   Sd/-                                                                                        Sd/-                                                                        

S.M.LATHAMAHESWARI                                                                            R.SUBBIAH                        

           MEMBER                                                                                           PRESIDENT