Additional District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Rajarhat (New Town ) | Kreta Suraksha Bhavan,Rajarhat(New Town),2nd Floor | Premises No. 38-0775, Plot No. AA-IID-31-3, New Town,P.S.-Eco Park,Kolkata - 700161 |
|
Complaint Case No. CC/353/2021 | ( Date of Filing : 16 Nov 2021 ) |
| | 1. Sri Gautam Gangapadhyay S/o Sri Phani Bhusan Gangapadhyay | Residing at 181/1, Canal Street, Sreebhumi, Kolkata-700048, P.S- Lake Town. |
| ...........Complainant(s) | |
Versus | 1. M/s. B.G. Construction | P-868, Block-A, Lake Town, Kolkata-700089, P.S- Lake Town. | 2. Sri Arijit Ghosh | Flat No.12, Block-BI, 69/1, Patipukur Housing Estate, Kolkata-700048, P.S- Lake Town. | 3. Sri Prankrishna Bhowmick | 42/1, S.K. Dev Road, 3rd By Lane, Patipukur, Kolkata-700048, P.S- Lake Town. | 4. Smt Sujata Dutta | 42/1, S.K. Dev Road, 3rd By Lane, Patipukur, Kolkata-700048, P.S- Lake Town. | 5. Sri Chinmoy Dutta | 42/1, S.K. Dev Road, 3rd By Lane, Patipukur, Kolkata-700048, P.S- Lake Town. |
| ............Opp.Party(s) |
|
|
Final Order / Judgement | Order No. 12 Ld. Pleader Commissioner is present and files report along with copy of IGR. Neither the complainant nor his Advocate is found present. It may be pointed out that when Ld. Advocate Naznin Begum being the Ld. Advocate Commissioner already submitted her report in connection of the registration of the deed in question along with photocopy of IGR and another copy of connected paper relating to that, in that event, complainant made himself absent for the reason best known to him. But when copy of IGR has placed before this Commission submitted through the Ld. Advocate Commissioner, there is no need at all to proceed further with the case. Perhaps, it seems that when complainant got his relief entirely he didn’t care to appear before this Commission. Thus, the instance case is disposed of accordingly. Dictated and corrected by [HON'BLE MR. Shri Sankar Kumar Ghosh] PRESIDENT | |