West Bengal

Kolkata-I(North)

CC/155/2017

M/s . A. N. Construction - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s. Amritsar Transport Co. Pvt. Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Bhaskar Roy

11 May 2017

ORDER

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kolkata - I (North)
8B, Nelie Sengupta Sarani, 4th Floor, Kolkata-700087.
Web-site - confonet.nic.in
 
Complaint Case No. CC/155/2017
 
1. M/s . A. N. Construction
Sh. Animesh Nandi, Proprietor, 4B, Dinabandhu Chakraborty Lane, P.S. - Burtala, Kolkata - 700006.
WB
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. M/s. Amritsar Transport Co. Pvt. Ltd.
134/1, 1st Floor, M. G. Road, P.S. - Burrabazar, Kolkata - 700007.
WB
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Sambhunath Chatterjee PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Sk. Abul Answar MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 11 May 2017
Final Order / Judgement

Order no. 3

The complainant filed this case with the allegation that the complainant had availed the services of the o.p. and booked a consignment containing 2621 retro reflective type structure plate total amounting to Rs. 7,94,294/- and the goods are to be delivered to M/s. Competent Electric System, Bhupal, Madhya Pradesh. The said consignment booked on 27/01/2017 and the amount charged was Rs. 10,936/-. But the said consignment was not reached to the destination for which the complainant filed this case praying for refund of the amount of Rs. 69,064/- and compensation of Rs. 2,00,000/- and litigation cost of Rs. 5,000/-.

On perusal of the record it appears that the consignment was held up by the sales tax authority in Indore for which the complainant was   informed as to why the consignment was not delivered within the stipulated time. Since the clearance of sales tax was required for which the consignment was withheld by the concerned authority. There was no deficiency in service on the part of the o.p. Thereby we hold that the case filed by the complainant is not maintainable since the complainant failed to substantiate the allegation against the o.p. that there was any deficiency on their behalf.

In view of the said fact the case is dismissed in limini.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sambhunath Chatterjee]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sk. Abul Answar]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.