Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

A/260/2017

The Coimbatore Mill Stores & General Supplies Company, Rep by its Managing Partner, S.Vasudevan - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s. Ambal Auto , Rep by its Authorized Signatory & 2 ors - Opp.Party(s)

Babu Rangasamy-Applt.,

24 Feb 2022

ORDER

BEFORE THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE         Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                             PRESIDENT

                         Tmt. Dr. S. M. LATHA MAHESWARI                           MEMBER

 

F.A. No.260/2017

(Against the Order dt.11.12.2014 made in C.C. No.341/2013 on the file of

D.C.D.R.C., Coimbatore)

                         DATED THE 24^TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022

 

 

M/s. The Coimbatore Mill Stores and General Supplies Company,

Represented by its Managing Partner

Mr. S. Vasudevan,

No.808, Avinashi Road,

Coimbatore – 641 018.                                                       .. Appellant / Complainant.

-Versus-

1. M/s. Ambal Auto,

(A unit of Sree Saradhambal Automobiles Pvt. Ltd.),

Represented by its Authorised Signatory,

Opp. to Alvernia School,

Trichy Road,

Ramanathapuram,

Coimbatore – 641 045.

 

2. M/s. Maruthi True Value,

Represented by its Authorised Signatory,

No.61, NSR Road,

Saibaba Colony,

Coimbatore – 641 011.

 

3. M. Ramesh,

S/o. Mr. Mani,

Old No.25, New No.131, Near Maniakarar Street,

Coimbatore – 641 045.                                      .. Respondents / Opposite parties.

 

 Counsel for the Appellant / Complainant             : M/s. Babu Rangasamy

Counsel for the Respondents / Opposite parties  : Ms. N. Surya Senthil

 

          This appeal coming up before us on 24.02.2022 for appearance of both and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal and this Commission made the following Order in open court:                                                                                                

 

Docket Order

 

No representation for both.  This appeal is posted today for appearance of both and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal. 

When the matter was called at 10.30 A.M., the Appellant was not present. Hence, passed over and  called again at 01.15 P.M. Still, there is no representation for the appellant.  Hence we are of the view that keeping the appeal pending is of no use as parties are not interested in prosecuting the case.

Hence, the appeal is dismissed for default.  No order as to costs.

 

               

                   Sd/-                                                                                        Sd/-                                                                        

S.M.LATHAMAHESWARI                                                                            R.SUBBIAH                        

           MEMBER                                                                                           PRESIDENT