Kerala

Palakkad

CC/176/2021

M.P. Mohanan Pillai - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s. Agarwal Goods Carrier - Opp.Party(s)

K.V. Surendran

25 Aug 2022

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PALAKKAD
Near District Panchayath Office, Palakkad - 678 001, Kerala
 
Complaint Case No. CC/176/2021
( Date of Filing : 25 Oct 2021 )
 
1. M.P. Mohanan Pillai
S/o. P.R. Madhavan Pillai, 6/1432, Nikunjam, Lakshmy Gardens, Near Puliyal Bhagavati Temple, Karinkarapully (PO), Palakkad - 678 551
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. M/s. Agarwal Goods Carrier
(A Unit of Agarwal Road Assistance Limited), Plot No.1, Midc , T.T.C . Area, Nr. Bus Depot, Mahape, Navi Mumbai- 400 701
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Vinay Menon.V PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Vidya A MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. Krishnankutty. N.K MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 25 Aug 2022
Final Order / Judgement

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION PALAKKAD

Dated this the  25th day of  August, 2022

 

Present  :  Sri.Vinay Menon V., President        

             :   Smt.Vidya A., Member

             :   Sri. Krishnankutty N.K.,Member

              

Date of filing:   25/10/2021.

                                           CC/176/2021

 

   M.P. Mohanan Pillai,                           -         Complainant           

   S/o.P.R.Madhavan Pillai, 6/1432,  

   Nikunjam, Lakshmy Gardens,

   Near Puliyal Bhagavati Temple,

   Karinkarapully (P.O),

   Palakkad-678 551.

   (By Adv.K.V.Surendran)   

                                                 Vs

 

   M/s. Agrwal Goods Carrier,                     -             Opposite Parties 

   (A Unit of Agarwal Road Assistance Limited),

   Plot No.1, MIDC, T.T.C.Area,Near.Bus Depot.,

   Mahape, Navi Mumbai-400 701.

   (Ex-Parte).

     

                                                 O R D E R

 

By Sri. Krishnankutty N.K.,Member

 

Pleadings of the complainant in brief.

 

1.      The complainant transported his TATA NEXON Car bearing registered No. MP/20CJ/85/3 through the opposite party from Jabalpur to Palakkad paying an amount of Rs.25000/-.

           The vehicle was taken from his sister-in-law Smt. Prasanna Sharma’s  residence in Jabalpur by the agent of the opposite party on 07.08.2021 undertaking to deliver it in Palakkad within 7 days.  Since the vehicle was not delivered as promised, the complainant contacted the opposite party after 10 days through the available phone number.  It was informed that the vehicle will be delivered within 3 days.  Since the delivery did not happen and as there was no response to the phone calls, Smt. Prasanna Sharma filed a complaint before the Thane City police on 24.08.2021. 

           The complainant had been continuously trying to contact the opposite party.  To one such call, one Mr. Surendra Gowda informed that the vehicle is in transit and it would reach the destination immediately.  The complainant managed to get the phone number of the driver who had taken the car from Jabalpur.  From the contact details provided by him, the complainant gathered the information that the vehicle is abandoned at Bengaluru.  As demanded by the Bengaluru concern, the complainant had to pay Rs.19000/- more for taking delivery of the vehicle from Bengaluru and  another Rs. 12000/- for taking the vehicle from Bengaluru to Palakkad.  Contrary to the agreement between the complainant and opposite party, to deliver the consignment to Palakkad, the opposite party left the car unattended at Bengaluru.  There is Deficiency in service on the part of opposite party in not delivering the car in Palakkad. 

                   The prayer of the complainant is for a compensation of

           (1)  Rs.56000/-, being the amount spent by him with 12% interest

               from  06.08.2021.

          (2)  Rs.20000/- towards mental agony and grievance  caused to

               the  complainant.

2.        Notices were issued twice to the opposite party in the address  

  given by the complainant but got returned for reasons “LEFT” &

  UNKNOWN   respectively.  Then the notice was sent by E mail to the

mail Id  given  in the documents appended to the complaint.  Though the notice was  delivered, the opposite party did not enter appearance and hence        opposite party was set  ex-parte.

3.           Complainant filed proof Affidavit on 27.07.2022 and marked Exhibits

        A1-A5 as documentary evidence.  From the exhibits adduced as evidence,

        it is clear  that the opposite party failed to ensure the delivery of the

        vehicle at Palakkad as promised, even after taking the full transporting

        charges in advance.  This has resulted in causing  mental agony to the

        complainant apart from being forced to expend additional amount for

        taking delivery of the vehicle from Bengaluru and further transporting it

        to  Palakkad.

4.    This is a definite case of  deficiency in service and Unfair trade practice.

     Hence the complaint is allowed, awarding the following reliefs,

    1)  Opposite party is directed to pay 56000/- being the amount spent by

         the  complainant in full along with an interest @ 12% pay from

         06.08.2021 till the date of payment.

    2)    To pay Rs.10,000/- as compensation  towards mental agony and the

            inconvenience caused to the complaint.  

   3)   Cost of Rs.7,500/- (Rupees Seven thousand and five hundred only)

           Both these amounts are to be paid within 45 days of receipt of this order failing which a solatium of Rs.250/- month or part thereof shall be payable till the date of payment.

             Pronounced in the open court on this the   25th   day of August,

       2022.

                                                                                          Sd/-

                                                                                     Vinay Menon V

                                          President

                                                                                             Sd/-

                                                                                          Vidya A

                                            Member

                                                                                         Sd/-

                                                                                  Krishnankutty N.K

                                                                                            Member

 

Appendix

Exhibits marked on the side of complainant

Ext. A1–Mailed copy of quotation Agarwal goods carrier.

Ext.A2-Potocopy of cash deposit  slip of State Bank of India dated 06.08.2021.

Ext.A3-Photocopy of the invoice

Ext.A4-Photocopy of email complaint  dated 24.08.2021.

Ext.A5-Photocopy of statement Union bank, Kodumb branch account.

Exhibits marked on the side of Opposite parties:Nil

Witness examined from complainant’s side:- NIL

Witness examined from opposite party’s side:- NIL

Cost: Rs.7500/- (Rupees Seven thousand and  five hundred only )

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Vinay Menon.V]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Vidya A]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Krishnankutty. N.K]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.