1.Mrs.Junu Gandhi w/o Sh.Lovleen Gandhi and;

2.Mr.Lovleen Gandhi s/o Sh.P.C.Gandhi,

Both resident of H.No.780, Sector-8, Panchkula

……Appellants/complainants

V e r s u s

1.M/s. Whirlpool of India Ltd., Branch Office SCO No.910, (Top Floor) NAC, Manimajra, Chandigarh, and;

2.M/s. Modern Electronics, SCO No.13, 

Appeal under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

BEFORE:  

Argued by:

PER JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER (RETD.), PRESIDENT

2.             

3.            

4.            

5.              It was further stated that the complainants had taken the delivery of said items, at the time of delivery of the water purifier. It was further stated that neither there was any deficiency, in rendering service, on the part of Opposite Party No.2, nor it indulged into unfair trade practice. The remaining averments, were denied, being wrong.

6.           

7.            

8.           

9.            

10.        

11.         

12.        09.05.2011. It was proved from these invoices, that the complainants had made the payment of Rs.4,567/- i.e. Rs.2,242/- and Rs.2,325/- respectively, against advance EMI of the Whirlpool Water Purifier and Stabilizer, respectively to Opposite Party No.2.  The submission of appellant no.2/complainant no.2, in this regard, therefore, being devoid of merit, must fail, and the same stands rejected.

13.        

14.        

15.        

16.        

17.        

18.        

Pronounced.

September 12, 2013

Sd/-

[JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER (RETD.)]

PRESIDENT

Sd/-

(DEV RAJ)

MEMBER

Rg