A.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

 ATHYDERABAD.

F.A. 1252/2006 against C.C. 269/2006 , Dist. Forum-III,Hyderabad. 

Between:

M.D. HajiS/o. M. D. Gafoor

Age: 40 years, Welder

R/o. 13-6-825/73,

Moghal Ka Nalal

Langar House,

Hyderabad.M/s. Venkateswara Motors

Authorised Dealer for Hero Honda

3-5-1105, Narayanguda

Hyderabad.                                                                                               

Counsel for the Appellant:     

Counsel for the Respondent:                     

QUORUM:

THURSDAY, THIS THE SIXTH

Oral Order: (Per Hon’ble Justice D. Appa Rao, President)

          authorised dealer of             

The      

                     Suppressing the above said facts he filed this case.       

          deficiency in service, 

                                  they have categorically informed     

               borne   If really, the respondent was fully aware that it was not having any spare parts and it could not repair the defects, it could not have taken the vehicle for repairs.      

Curiously   insistence     This we repeat  

If the respondent     

Learned counsel for the respondent contended that           consolidated sum of Rs. 50,000/- towards cost of travel, and for the inconvenience caused to the complainant. 

Coming to the facts the complainant returned the vehicle to the respondent informing that                     where the complainant is entitled to refund of the cost of the vehicle.    The complainant   Therefore, this  

In the result the appeal is allowed in part.   with interest @ 9% p.a., from 24.1.2006 till the date of realization together with costs of Rs. 1,000/-. 

PRESIDENT