NCDRC

NCDRC

CC/317/2013

Shri MAYANK PODDAR & ANR., - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s UNITECH LTD. & 2 ORS., - Opp.Party(s)

MR. SANTOSH K. SETHI,

23 Jul 2014

ORDER

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
CONSUMER CASE NO. 317 OF 2013
 
WITH
IA/7180/2013
1. Shri MAYANK PODDAR & ANR.,
Park Center, 9th Floor, 24, Park Street,
KOLKATA - 700016.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus 
1. M/s UNITECH LTD. & 2 ORS.,
Regd. Office: 6, Community Centre, Saket,
NEW DELHI - 110017.
2. Shri Ramesh Chandra, Executive Chairman,
C/o Unitech Limited, 6, Community Centre, Saket,
NEW DELHI - 110017.
3. Shri Sanjay Chandra, MD,
C/o Unitech Limited, 6, Community Centre, Saket,
NEW DELHI - 110017.
...........Opp.Party(s)
CONSUMER CASE NO. 318 OF 2013
 
WITH
IA/7180/2013
1. Shri MAYANK PODDAR & ANR.
Park Center, 9th Floor, 24, Park Street,
KOLKATA - 110016.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus 
1. M/s UNITECH LTD. & 2 ORS.,
Regd. Office: 6, Community Centre, Saket,
NEW DELHI - 110017.
2. Shri Ramesh Chandra, Executive Chairman,
C/o Unitech Limited, 6, Community Centre, Saket,
NEW DELHI - 110017.
3. Shri Sanjay Chandra, MD,
C/o Unitech Limited, 6, Community Centre, Saket,
NEW DELHI - 110017.
...........Opp.Party(s)
CONSUMER CASE NO. 319 OF 2013
 
WITH
IA/7180/2013
1. Shri MAYANK PODDAR & ANR.,
Park Center, 9th Floor, 24, Park Street,
KOLKATA - 700016.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus 
1. M/s UNITECH LTD. & 2 ORS.,
Regd. Office: 6, Community Centre, Saket,
NEW DELHI - 110017.
2. Shri Ramesh Chandra, Executive Chairman,
C/o Unitech Limited, 6, Community Centre, Saket,
NEW DELHI - 110017.
3. Shri Sanjay Chandra, MD,
C/o Unitech Limited, 6, Community Centre, Saket,
NEW DELHI - 110017.
...........Opp.Party(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. MALIK, PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. DR. S.M. KANTIKAR, MEMBER

For the Complainant :
Mr. Santosh K. Sethi, Advocate
For the Opp.Party :
Ms. Kartika Sharma, Advocate with
Mr. Ashok Kr. Dubey, DGM(Legal)

Dated : 23 Jul 2014
ORDER

Learned counsel for the parties present.  Arguments heard.

          Learned counsel for the complainants wants to withdraw the complaints with liberty to file the case before the appropriate forum.

          Permission granted.

          All the four complaints are dismissed as withdrawn.  The complainants are given liberty to get redressal of their grievances before the appropriate forum, as per law.

         

In so far as point of limitation is concerned, the complainants can also take benefit of the decision rendered in the case of Laxmi Engineering Works vs. P.S.G. Industrial Institute (1995) 3 SCC 583.

 

 
......................J
J.M. MALIK
PRESIDING MEMBER
......................
DR. S.M. KANTIKAR
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.