Chandigarh

DF-I

CP/39/2010

Tarsem lal Singla - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s Tata Motors Ltd. SCO No. 170-171-172 - Opp.Party(s)

09 Apr 2010

ORDER


CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM - I Plot No 5- B, Sector 19 B, Madhya Marg, Chandigarh - 160 019
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 39 of 2010
1. Tarsem lal SinglaSingla S/o Late Sh. Gujjarmal Age 73 Yrs, R/o 179, Sector-15 Panchkula ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. M/s Tata Motors Ltd. SCO No. 170-171-172#15 Industrial Area Phase-1 Chandigarh through its Manager & Ors.2. M/s Tata Motors Ltd.SCO No. 170-171-172 1st Floor Sector-17/C Chandigarh thrugh its Manager3. M/s tata Motors Ltd. SCO No. 305-306 3rd Floor Signature Tower South City Gurgaon through itsManager ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :
For the Respondent :

Dated : 09 Apr 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HELD IN DISTRICT FORUM-I, U.T.

CHANDIGARH

 

                                                            Criminal Complaint No. 39 of 2010

In

Complaint Case No. 1315 of 2009

 

 

Tarsem Lal Singla                                                   –   Complainant

 

                        Versus

 

1.         Hind Motors ((India) Ltd., Chandigarh.

 

2.         M/s Tata Motors Ltd., Chandigarh.

 

3.         M/s Tata Motors Ltd., Gurgaon.

 

                                                                                                - Opposite Parties

 

Present:         Sh.Pavinder Singh Bedi, Advocate for Complainant.        

                        Sh.Gagan Aggarwal, Advocate for OP No.1.

                        Sh.P.K.Kukreja, Advocate for OP No.2 & 3.

 

Dated, the 9th day of April, 2010.

                                                            ORDER

 

                        In view of the statement made by counsel for complainant, this execution application is dismissed as withdrawn. The complainant would be at liberty to file afresh execution application after the decision of appeals pending before the Hon’ble State Commission or as & when the stay order is vacated, if need be.

                        Copies of this order free of cost be supplied to the parties. The file be consigned.

                                                                                                PRESIDING OFFICER

            LOK ADALAT

 

 

 

                                    2nd MEMBER                                     1st MEMBER

 


RAJINDER SINGH GILL, MEMBERHONABLE MR. JAGROOP SINGH MAHAL, PRESIDENT ,