Andhra Pradesh

Visakhapatnam-II

CC/222/2011

Lanka Mohana Rao - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s Tata Motors Finance Limited - Opp.Party(s)

D.N. Murthy

27 Nov 2014

ORDER

                                              Date of Registration of the Complaint:23-06-2011

                                                                                                Date of Order:27-11-2014

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMERS FORUM-II AT

                             VISAKHAPATNAM

 

P  r  e  s  e  n  t:

1.  Sri H. Ananda Rao, M.A., L.L.B.,

     President           

2. Smt K. Saroja, M.A. B.L.,

     Lady Member 

                                3. Sri C.V. Rao, M.A., B.L.,

                                     Male Member

        Thursday, the 27^th day of November, 2014.

                                CONSUMER CASE No.222 of 2011

Between:-

Lanka Mohana Rao, S/o Chinnam Naidu,

Hindu, aged 47 years, residing at D.No.29-8-9/F-1,

Dabagardens, Sai Surya Residency,

Visakhapatnam-530 016.

                                                                                                 ….. Complainant

And:-

1.The Manager, M/s. Tata Motors Finance Ltd.,

   Visakhapatnam Branch, having its office at

   D.No.8-1-7, Akruti Apartments, Balaji Nagar,

   Visakhapatnam.

2.The Manager, M/s. Tata Motors Finance Ltd.,

    having their Office at Cyber Tech. House,

   1^st Floor, B-63/65, Road No.21/24,

   J.B. Seventh Marg. Wagle Estate,

   Thane-400 604.

                                                                                        …  Opposite Parties

            

This case coming on 27.11.2014 for final hearing of the Complainant before us in the presence of Sri D.N. Murthy, Advocate for the Complainant and Sri P. Prabhakara Rao, Advocate for the 2^nd Opposite Party and the 1^st Opposite Party being exparte having stood over till this date for consideration, this Forum made the following:

                                                ORDER

      (As per Sri H. Ananda Rao Honourable President on behalf of the Bench)

 

          Memo filed by the Complainant after issuing notice to the other side not pressing the Complainant.   Heard both sides.   Memo is recorded.   Complaint is dismissed as not pressed.   Without costs.

 

Sd/-                                          Sd/-                                                   Sd/-

Male Member                       Lady Member                                 President