West Bengal

Rajarhat

CC/15/2022

Sri Sunil Kumar Guha, S/o Late Hiralal Guha - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s Tara Maa Special,Proprietor Sri Jibon Deb,S/O-Late Rakhal Chnadra Deb - Opp.Party(s)

Mr Raktim Sarkar

02 Feb 2022

ORDER

Additional Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Rajarhat (New Town )
Kreta Suraksha Bhavan,Rajarhat(New Town),2nd Floor
Premises No. 38-0775, Plot No. AA-IID-31-3, New Town,P.S.-Eco Park,Kolkata - 700161
 
Complaint Case No. CC/15/2022
( Date of Filing : 24 Jan 2022 )
 
1. Sri Sunil Kumar Guha, S/o Late Hiralal Guha
Residing at 64/3/F/A5,Nabin Chandra Das Road,P.O.-Noapara,P.S.-Baranagar,Kolkata-700090,District-North 24 Parganas
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. M/s Tara Maa Special,Proprietor Sri Jibon Deb,S/O-Late Rakhal Chnadra Deb
Office at 33/44/1,Nabin Chandra Das Road,P.O.-Noapara,P.S-Baranagar,Kolkata-700090,District-North 24 Parganas
2. M/s Akash Path Tour & Travels ,Proprietor namely Dipak Kr Ghosh
Office at Sodepur Road,office at 2 no.Debigarh,Lokenath Super Market,Madhyamgram,Kolkata-700129,P.O.& P.S.-Madhyamgram ,District-North 24 Parganas
3. Vistara Air Lines,A Tata SIA Airlines Ltd.
Jeevan Bharti Tower-1,10th Floor,124 Connaught Circus,New Delhi 110001,India
4. The Managing Director,Vistara Air Lines,A Tata SIA Airlines Ltd
Office at Jeevan Bharti Tower-1,10th Floor,124 Connaught Circus,West Delhi 110001,India
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Lakshmi Kanta Das PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Silpi Majumder MEMBER
 
PRESENT:Mr Raktim Sarkar, Advocate for the Complainant 1
 
Dated : 02 Feb 2022
Final Order / Judgement

Today is fixed for admission hearing.

After hearing the Ld. Advocate of the complainant and perusing the material placed before us, we find that air tickets purchased at Rs. 28,063/- on 06.11.2019 from the Op 1 are the subject matter of this case.

It is the specified case of the complainant that the price of the tickets has not been refunded although the journey, for which the tickets were purchased, was not taken up.

It is contended by the Ld. Advocate of the complainant that the Op 1 got those tickets cancelled after receiving  information of the non-performance of the journey by the complainant. But the record reveals no documents to show that the tickets were cancelled or that refund of the price of the ticket with or without deduction was made in favour of any of the Ops. The letter to which reference has been made by the Ld. Advocate was issued in November 2021- although the purchase of tickets was made on 06.11.2019.

In the absence of documents to show up cancellation of the tickets or collection of refund money, we are unable to say that the complainant has got a good case to proceed. We think that this is a fit case where a dismissal order should be recorded.

Hence it is ordered that the case be and the same is dismissed as being not admitted.

Let plain copy be given to the parties, free of cost, as per CPR.

 

Dictated and corrected by

 [HON'BLE MR. Lakshmi Kanta Das]
PRESIDENT

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Lakshmi Kanta Das]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Silpi Majumder]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.