M/s Super Sale V/S K.S. Manjunath - Consumer Court Case

Karnataka

Mysore

CC/95/66

K.S. Manjunath - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s Super Sale - Opp.Party(s)

30 Jul 1996

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MYSORE
No.1542/F, Anikethana Road, C and D Block, J.C.S.T. Layout, Kuvempunagara, (Behind Jagadamba Petrol Bunk), Mysore-570009.
consumer case(CC) No. CC/95/66

K.S. Manjunath						...........Appellant(s)
Vs.
M/s Super Sale						...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:

Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):

OppositeParty/Respondent(s):

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

Complaint is filed claiming total compensation of Rs.1,325/- on the ground of defective chappals sold by the opposite party. It is the case of the complainant that on 8.2.1995, he purchased a pair of chappals from lthe opposite party company for Rs.325/-. The opposite party agreed to exchange chappals if any defect was noticed within 3 months. Unfortunately the chappals expanded obnormally within a week of purchase and could not be used. Therefore the complainant has sought for refund of the price of the chappals and for compensation of Rs.1,000/- for mental agony and inconvenience caused to him. The opposite party has been duly served with the notice of the complaint. He has not chosen to file his version. Complainant was called upon to lead evidence on affidavit to prove his case. He has not chosen to adduce any evidence nor has he chosen to produce the alleged defective chappals despite issue of notice to produce the chappals. In the circumstances we hold that the complainant is not entitled to any relief. Therefore the complaint is dismissed.

Complaint is filed claiming total compensation of Rs.1,325/- on the ground of defective chappals sold by the opposite party.<br /> It is the case of the complainant that on 8.2.1995, he purchased a pair of chappals from lthe opposite party company for Rs.325/-. The opposite party agreed to exchange chappals if any defect was noticed within 3 months. Unfortunately the chappals expanded obnormally within a week of purchase and could not be used. Therefore the complainant has sought for refund of the price of the chappals and for compensation of Rs.1,000/- for mental agony and inconvenience caused to him.<br /> The opposite party has been duly served with the notice of the complaint. He has not chosen to file his version.<br /> Complainant was called upon to lead evidence on affidavit to prove his case. He has not chosen to adduce any evidence nor has he chosen to produce the alleged defective chappals despite issue of notice to produce the chappals.<br /> In the circumstances we hold that the complainant is not entitled to any relief. Therefore the complaint is dismissed.