Delhi

West Delhi

CC/15/408

SANDEEP KUMAR - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/S SUPER ELECTRONIC - Opp.Party(s)

25 Apr 2017

ORDER

 

408/15                   D.O.O- 25.04.2017

Present :-          None for complainant.

                    Counsel for OPs 2 and 3.

                    OP-1 exparte.

                    Complaint passed over several times since morning. But none put in appearance on behalf of complainant to pay conditional cost of Rs.500/- and file evidence, despite claimed by counsel for opposite parties. It is already 02.55 P.M. No further wait is justified and possible. Complainant was not present on previous date for hearing also. It seems that Complainant is not interested in prosecution of Complaint.  

Therefore, this forum has no option except to dismiss the Complaint in default for non-prosecution. Hence the Complaint is dismissed in default for non prosecution.

Copy of order be sent to the parties as per rules. File be consigned.   

 

                       

(PUNEET LAMBA)                                                              ( R.S.  BAGRI )

          MEMBER                                                               PRESIDENT

        25.04.2017                                                                                                   25.04.2017

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.