Andhra Pradesh

StateCommission

FA/1744/07

Sri T. Seethapathi Rao (PIP) - Complainant(s)

Versus

Ms State Bank of India - Opp.Party(s)

28 Nov 2008

ORDER

 
First Appeal No. FA/1744/07
(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District Vizianagaram)
 
1. Sri T. Seethapathi Rao (PIP)
Flat No.301, Lakshmi Ganapathi Housing Complex, Srinivasa Nagar-2, Near M.S.N. Colony, Vizianagaram.
Andhra Pradesh
2. Smt. T. Sandhya
Sub Post Master, Kothapeta, Resident of Rest.
Andhra Pradesh
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Ms State Bank of India
Region-5, Zonal Office, Visakhapatnam.
Andhra Pradesh
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

A.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

 ATHYDERABAD.

 

F.A. 1744/2007 against C.D. 44/2006 , Dist. Forum, Vizianagaram 

 

Between:

 

1.T. Seethapathi Rao

S/o. Late Sri Ram Murthy

Age: 53 years, Incharge SBCO

Parvathipuram, Presently

Working at Vizianagaram

Head Post Office

 

2.Smt. T. Sandhya

W/o. Seethapathi Rao

45, Sub-Post Master

Kothapeta, 

R/o. Flat No. 301,

Lakshmi Ganapathi Housing Complex

Srinivasa Nagar-2, Near MSN Colony

Vizianagaram.                

1. The State Bank ofIndia

Rep. by its Deputy General Manager

Region-V, Zonal Office

Visakapatnam.

 

2. The Branch Manager

State Bank ofIndia,

FortBranch, Vizianagaram                                                                                                    

                                                                                     Counsel for the Appellants:                       Counsel for the Respondents:                   

 

QUORUM:

                       

                                                                         

 

FRIDAY, THIS THE TWENTYEIGTH 

 

 

Oral Order: (Per Hon’ble Justice D. Appa Rao, President)

 

                                                          

           Unsuccessful complainants are the appellants. 

 

 

 

 

         India.      After coming to know of it, they sent letters informing the same.    

 

                  did not make any payment in                     

 

                

 

          appreciate the facts in correct perspective. 

 

         

 

           

 

                   gave a reply in Ex. A6  

 

         

 

              

 

          

          date stamp of 2.5.2005. 

 

                   

 

 

 

 

 

                    B2, B4 which we have already stated bore the seal of ‘March’, they did not pertain to the month of ‘May’.  that they were created for the purpose of this case.

 

 

         ndnd         filed by them bear the date    up till     

 

 

 

India of      

We feel that an amount of Rs. 15,000/- should be awarded towards compensation which we feel reasonable and modest as against the claim of Rs. 25,000/- besides

 

In the result the appeal is allowed.   

 

 

 

         

         

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.