Tamil Nadu

Thiruvallur

CC/57/2013

K.Subramani - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s State Bank of India - Opp.Party(s)

M/s V.Srinivasaragavan

07 Jul 2015

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
THIRUVALLUR
No.1-D, C.V.NAIDU SALAI, 1st CROSS STREET,
THIRUVALLUR-602 001
 
Complaint Case No. CC/57/2013
 
1. K.Subramani
No.218, Big St., Nabalur village & post, Tiruthani
Thiruvallur
Tamilnadu
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. M/s State Bank of India
M.P.S.Salai, Tiruthani
Thiruvallur
Tamilnadu
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  THIRU.S.PANDIAN, B.Sc., L.L.M., PRESIDENT
  Tmt.S.Sujatha, B.Sc., MEMBER
  Mr.V.VENKATESAN, M.A., B.Ed., MBA.,M.Phil.,B.L MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:M/s V.Srinivasaragavan, Advocate
For the Opp. Party: M/s B.Krishna kumar, Advocate
ORDER

Filed On:14.11.2013

Disposed On:07.07.2015

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, THIRUVALLUR

     PRESENT; THIRU. S. PANDIAN, B.Sc., L.L.M.,                                :  PRESIDENT

                        TMT.    S.  SUJATHA, B.SC.,                                             :  MEMBER-I

              THIRU. V.  VENKATESAN, M.A.B.Ed., MBA. M.PHIL.B.L.  :   MEMBER-II

Thursday, the Day of 7th July- 2015

CC. No. 57 / 2013

K. Subramani

S/o. Krishna mandadi

No. 218, Big Street     

Nabalur Village & Post

Tiruttani Taluk.                                                              ….Complainant

-Vs-

The Chief Manager

State Bank of India

M.P.S. Salai

Tiruttani.                                                                       …Opposite Party

 

Counsel For Complainant                          : Mr. K. Subramani, Party –in-Person

Counsel For Opposite Party                       : M/s. V. Rajkumar Joshi, Advocate

 

ORDER

PRONOUNCED BY THIRU. S. PANDIAN, PRESIDENT

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Thiruvallur.

 

        Both parties called absent.  It is seen from adjudication that it is pending for filing of proof affidavit on the side of the complainant from 9.2.2015.  From that day on words, the complainant has not come forward to file is proof affidavit, even sufficient time is given.  No other representation for the past hearings.  It clearly shows the disinterest of the complainant in the progress of the case.  Therefore there is no justification to proceed further without any progress.  Hence, this complaint is Dismissed for Default.   No Costs.

Sd/-***                                                           Sd/-***                                        Sd/-***

MEMBER-I                                            MEMBER -II                              PRESIDENT

 
 
[ THIRU.S.PANDIAN, B.Sc., L.L.M.,]
PRESIDENT
 
[ Tmt.S.Sujatha, B.Sc.,]
MEMBER
 
[ Mr.V.VENKATESAN, M.A., B.Ed., MBA.,M.Phil.,B.L]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.