Andhra Pradesh

StateCommission

FA/1337/08

DR.KUTTAN PILLAI BHASKARAN - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/S STATE BANK OF INDIA - Opp.Party(s)

MR.A.JAYA RAJU

28 Mar 2011

ORDER

 
First Appeal No. FA/1337/08
(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District East Godwari-II at Rajahmundry)
 
1. DR.KUTTAN PILLAI BHASKARAN
H.NO.2-47/4 NORTH EAST MEADOWS, DESHUMUKHI VILLAGE, POCHAM PALLY MANDAL.
NALGONDA
Andhra Pradesh
2. MR.SYBU MOIN BHASKARAN
H.NO.2-47/4 NORTH EAST MEADOWS, DESHUMUKHI VILLAGE, POCHAMPALLY MANDAL.
NALGONDA
ANDHRA PRADESH
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. M/S STATE BANK OF INDIA
REP.BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER, PBB KUKATPALLY, 121-128A, ALLURI TRADE CENTRE, BHAGYA NAGAR COLONY.
HYDERABAD
Andhra Pradesh
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONABLE MR. JUSTICE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE D. APPA RAO PRESIDENT
 HONABLE MRS. M.SHREESHA Member
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

BEFORE THE A.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

ATHYDERABAD.

 

F.A. 1337/2008   

Between:

1) 

S/o.   

2) 

s/o. 

Both R/o. 2-47/4

North East Meadows,

Deshmukh village, Pochampally (M)

Nalgonda Dist.                                                                            And

State Bank ofIndia

Rep. by its Chief Manager

PBB, Kukatpally,

121-128A, Alluri Trade Centre

Bhagyanagar Colony,Hyderabad.                                                                                               Counsel for the Appellant:                         

Counsel for the Resp:             

                                     CORAM:

                       

    

 

 

MONDAY, THIS THE TWENTY EIGTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND ELVEN

 

Oral Order: (Per Hon’ble Justice D. Appa Rao, President)

 

                                                          

1)       

 

2)                India 6,50,000/- at 8% fixed rate of interest per annum on 16.12.2004 to construct a house.                           8% it had calculated floating rate of interest                      

3)                                                     

 

4)         

5)                     

 

6)             

 

7)               

 

8)                             and another ‘to be deleted       as contended by the bank it could have been said so without mentioning that it was 8% p.a., in   No other clauses were shown wherein the bank had agreed to sanction loan        Therefore, we are of the opinion  

 

9)                        singly or jointly     

In the counter the bank has categorically                 Originally an amount of Rs. 4,000/-                

 

10)                    entitled to recover       

 

 

1)PRESIDENT 

 

2)      MEMBER

                                                         Dt.  

*pnr

 

 

 

 

 

“UP LOAD – O.K.”

 
 
[HONABLE MR. JUSTICE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE D. APPA RAO]
PRESIDENT
 
[HONABLE MRS. M.SHREESHA]
Member

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.