Date of filing: 18.11.2013 Date of disposal: 28.7.2017
Dhr(s)/Complainant (s):
1. Umesh Agarwal 2. Mr.Manik Lal Chakraborty 3. Kingshuk Burman 4. Ramanuj Chatterjee 5. Dipti Dutta. 6. Ashish Kr. Mondal
7. Jharna Sengupta 8. Guru Prasad Tah 9. Anjana Saha
10. Tilak Dubey 11. Kumarjit Nayak 12. Mrs.Mousumi Nayak
13. Dilip Majumdar 14. Kabita Ghosh 15. Subrata Samanta
16. Sharmistha Chakraborty 17. Amit Kr. Bose 18. Aloke Banerjee
19. Sulata Das 20. Aloka Mukherjee 21. Rahul Kundu
22. Aloke Kr. Choudhury 23. Shyamal Halder 24. Sudipa Ghosh
25. Sankar Sarkar 26. Anushree Ghoshal 27. Tripti Narayan Ghatak
28. Taruna Ghatak 29. Uday Sankar Chel 30. Soma Saha
31. P.K. Mukherjee 32. Dr.Snigdhendu Ghosh 33. Manas Bose
34. Ashoke Kr. Paul 35. Sumit Dutta 36. Nabanita Dutta
37. Bijon Kr. Chakraborty 38. Supriya Chakraborty 39. Dr. Anirban Mitra
40. Silchan Roy Chaudhury 41. Barada Kinkar Sen 42. Rama Sen.
43. Sujit Roy 44. Mithu Bhowmik.
All are resident of Vrindavan Garden Complex, Itbhata Road, Chotonilpur, Burdwan.
-VERSUS-
Jdr (s)/Opposite Party (s):
M/s. Sri Shyam Developers, a partnership firm, having its office at Chotonilpur, Itbhata Road, P.,O.-Sripally, Dist.-Burdwan, PIN-713 103, represented by its partner Mr. Parikhit Surekha, S/o. Rajendra Kr. Surekha.
Present: Hon’ble Member: Sri Pankaj Kumar Sinha.
Hon’ble Member: Smt. Silpi Majumder.
Appeared for the Dhr (s)/Complainant (s): Ld. Advocate, Mirza Raja Begg & Debdas Rudra.
Appeared for the Jdr/Opposite Party: Ld. Advocate Mrinmoy Sinha.
Order No. 23, Dated: 28.7.2017
The Dhrs are Present through their respective ld. Advocate. Today is fixed for passing necessary order. It is evident from the record that being aggrieved with the order passed by this ld. Forum in the D.F. Case No. 94/2010, dated 31.7.2013 the present Jdr has preferred an appeal before the Hon’ble SCDRC, WB which was registered therein being No. FA/1034/2013.
The Hon’ble SCDRC, WB has been pleased to pass the final order/judgment on 07.3.2017 whereby the C. C. No. 94/2010 has been dismissed being not maintainable.
In view of the said order the present Execution Application has no legs to stand upon and it should be rejected.
Hence, it is
O r d e r e d
that the present Execution Application being No. 44/2013 is hereby rejected without any cost.
Let plain copies of this order be supplied to the parties free of cost as per provisions of law.
Dictated and corrected by me.
(Silpi Majumder)
Member
DCDRF, Burdwan
(Pankaj Kumar Sinha) (Silpi Majumder)
Member Member
DCDRF, Burdwan DCDRF, Burdwan