A.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
ATHYDERABAD.
F.A. 1278/2006 against C.D. 97/2004 , Dist. Forum, Srikakulam
Between:
1. National Insurance Company Ltd.
Branch Manager,G.T. Road.
Srikakulam
2. The Divisional Manager
National Insurance Company Ltd.
Divisional Office No. II, 1stRao & Sons Complex
Seethampeta Road,
Dwarakanagar
Visakapatnam-530 016.
3. The Regional Manager
National Insurance Company Ltd.
3rd
P.B. No. 39, Basheerbagh
Hyderabad-500 001.
M/s.SriShiridiSaiBabaWeighBridge
Rep. by its Proprietrix
Smt. Tammana Bharathi
W/o. Ram Kumar,Yetturalapadu (V)
Pedabammidi (P),Via – Tilaru R.S.
Kotabommali (M),Srikakulam Dist.
Counsel for the Appellant:
Counsel for the Respondent:
QUORUM:
MONDAY, THIS THE THIRD DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND EIGHT
Oral Order: (Per Hon’ble Justice D. Appa Rao, President)
It
It was installed on On 17.5.2002 had refused to receive the same.
The complainant
The Dist. Forum
Aggrieved by the said decision, the insurance company preferred this appeal contending that the interest awarded was at higher side. India
It is an undisputed fact that had submitted an estimation of repairs at a total cost of Rs. 3,60,500/-. surveyor
assessment of
from 01.09.2002
According to it, the complainant Evidently she got it repaired. Since the very machinery was insured for Rs. 4 lakhs, the loss could not have been Since the complainant did not produce any evidence as to the loss, a reasonable amount could be awarded in order to compensate the loss if any sustained by her.
partly allowed The appellant is also directed to pay Rs. 2,000/- towards costs in this appeal.
