Andhra Pradesh

StateCommission

FA/1117/08

M/S SRI SURAJ TIWARI SON OF SRI B.TIWARI - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/S SPICE JET LIMITED - Opp.Party(s)

SRI. A. KRISHNA RAO

17 Oct 2008

ORDER

 
First Appeal No. FA/1117/08
(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District Visakhapatnam-II)
 
1. M/S SRI SURAJ TIWARI SON OF SRI B.TIWARI
H.NO.10-1-166, NETAJI COLONY, FATHENAGAR, HYD.
HYDERABAD
Andhra Pradesh
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. M/S SPICE JET LIMITED
REP.BY ITS GM, 319, UDYOG VIHAR, PHASE-IV, GURGAON-122016.
GURGAON
HARYANA
2. MS SPICE JET LTD.
THE DEPUTY MANAGER, KOLKATTA AIR PORT.
KOLKATTA
3. MS SPICE JET LTD
THE DEPUTY MANAGER,SHAMSHABAD AIR PORT, INTL., SHAMSHABAD,
RANGA REDDY
ANDHRA PRADESH
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

A.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

 ATHYDERABAD.

 

F.A. 1117/2008 against C.D. 262/2008, Dist. Forum-III,Hyderabad

 

Between:

 

Suraj Tiwari

S/o. 

Age: 33 years,

H.No. 10-1-166, Netaji Colony

Fathenagar,Hyderabad.                                     1. M/s. Spice Jet Ltd.

Rep. by its General Manager

319, Udyog Vihar, Phase-IV

Gurugon-122 016

Haryana.

 

2. The Deputy Manager

Spice Jet Ltd.,

KolkattaAirPort

Kolkatta.

 

3. The Deputy Manager

Spice Jet Ltd.,

ShamshabadAirport

(Internationa)

Shamshabad, R.R. Dist.         

                                                                                               

Counsel for the Appellant:                         

Counsel for the Respondents:                   

 

QUORUM:

                  HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D. APPA RAO, PRESIDENT 

                                                                         

 

 

FRIDAY, THIS THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND EIGHT

 

 

Oral Order: (Per Hon’ble Justice D. Appa Rao, President)

 

 

                                                          

          

 

 

 

          Hyderabad

 

                 02.40 p.m. 2.10 p.m.     2.20 p.m. 2.20 p.m”.   board the flight and therefore he issued legal notice  

 

              2.40 p.m.2.20 p.m.      2.11 p.m., evidenced from the record.  

           

 

         

             

 

           Necessarily an adverse inference has to be drawn for not issuing the reply.    

 

          Hyderabad 2.40 p.m. 2.10 p.m.  a quarrel and therefore could not report in time. 2.20 p.m.    

 

 

 

 

 

            2.20 p.m. 2.10 p.m.2.11 p.m.  2.10 p.m. 2.10 p.m.     

         

 

         

         

         

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.