Kerala

StateCommission

CC/7/2023

PRAMODH P - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/S SOWPARNIKA PROJECTS AND INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD - Opp.Party(s)

N G MAHESH

27 Mar 2023

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
 
Complaint Case No. CC/7/2023
( Date of Filing : 25 Mar 2023 )
 
1. PRAMODH P
NARAYANA MANDIRAM EDAMULACKAL P O PUNALUR KOLLAM
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. M/S SOWPARNIKA PROJECTS AND INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD
NO 750 C BLOCK FIRST MAIN ROAD AECS LAYOUT KUNDALAHALLI BANGALORE 560037
2. THE MANAGER SOWPARNIKA PROJECTS
VETTAKULAM ARCADE OPPOSITE MAR IVANIOUSE COLLEGE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SRI.K.SURENDRA MOHAN PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. SRI.AJITH KUMAR.D JUDICIAL MEMBER
  SRI.RANJIT.R MEMBER
  SMT.BEENAKUMARI.A MEMBER
  SRI.RADHAKRISHNAN.K.R MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 27 Mar 2023
Final Order / Judgement

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

APPEAL No.178/2023

JUDGEMENT DATED: 27.03.2023

 

(Against the Order in C.C.No.31/2021 of CDRC, Palakkad)

 

PRESENT:

 

HON’BLE JUSTICE SRI. K. SURENDRA MOHAN 

:

PRESIDENT

SRI. RANJIT  R.

:

MEMBER

SMT. BEENA KUMARY A.

:

MEMBER

SRI. K.R. RADHAKRISHNAN

:

MEMBER

 

 

APPELLANT:

 

 

Shinod (ex-partime Salesman of Evergreem Plywoods, Palappuram), S/o Ramakrishnan, R/o Pandaraparambil House, Panamanna, Ananganadi, Ambalavattam, Palakkad – 679 501

 

 

(E. Suresh Kumar Nair)

 

Vs.

 

RESPONDENT:

 

1.

Innocent V.C., S/o V.K. Chacko, Valiyaveetil House, Near KVR High School, Shornur, Palakkad – 679 121

2.

Krishnakumar R., Proprietor, Evergreen Plywoods, 15/143-4, Near Kinfra Park, Palappuram, Palakkad – 679 103

 

Current address: Krishnakumar R., Plakoothathil House, Manisseri Post, East Manisseri, Palakkad – 679 103

 

 

 

JUDGEMENT

HON’BLE JUSTICE SRI. K. SURENDRA MOHAN : PRESIDENT

 

 

          This appeal is filed against an order dated 15.06.2022 of the Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Palakkad in C.C.No.31/2021.   Admittedly, the appellant before us is not a party in C.C.No.31/2021.   The complaint of the counsel for the appellant is that, he was arrested in execution of the order against which this appeal is filed, assuming that he was the Proprietor of the Evergreen Plywoods.  If that is true what the appellant should challenge is the said order in the Execution Petition.  He cannot have any grievance against an order passed by the District Commission against the Proprietor of the Evergreen Plywoods since he is admittedly not the proprietor of the said concern.  Therefore, we do not find any grounds to admit this appeal.  When this is pointed out to the counsel, the counsel seeks permission to withdraw the appeal.  Request is accepted.  This appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 

          Refund the amount of statutory deposit made at the time of filing this appeal to the counsel for the appellant on proper acknowledgement.

 

 

 

 

JUSTICE K. SURENDRA MOHAN 

:

PRESIDENT

RANJIT  R.

:

MEMBER

BEENA KUMARY A.

:

MEMBER

 K.R. RADHAKRISHNAN

:

MEMBER

 

 

SL

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SRI.K.SURENDRA MOHAN]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. SRI.AJITH KUMAR.D]
JUDICIAL MEMBER
 
 
[ SRI.RANJIT.R]
MEMBER
 
 
[ SMT.BEENAKUMARI.A]
MEMBER
 
 
[ SRI.RADHAKRISHNAN.K.R]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.