CC 89 of 2020    Baldev Singh         Vs.  Shri Ram City Union

Dated: 07.01.2022.

Present:  

For the Complainant:       None.

For the Opposite Parties: Amit Goyal, Advocate.

Again none has come present on behalf of the complainant nor tendered his evidence.  Case be called again after lunch.

(Aparana Kundi)          (Mohinder Singh Brar)        (Amrinder Singh Sidhu)

                 Member                                  Member                                  President

          Case called again after lunch time, but none has come present on behalf  of the complainant despite repeated calls.

          Perusal of the record shows that  from the last  many dates, none has come present on behalf of the complainant for pursuing his case. Not only this, vide order date 07.12.2021, the written  intimation was also sent to the complainant to prosecute his case, but despite written intimation sent to the complainant, today none has come present on behalf of the complainant. It is 4.00 PM. Hence, it is presumed that the complainant is not interested in prosecuting his case. As such, the present complaint is dismissed in default for want of prosecution. Copies of this order be supplied to the parties free of costs and thereafter, the file be consigned to record room after compliance.

Announced in open Commission.

Dated: 07.01.2022.

(Aparana Kundi)          (Mohinder Singh Brar)        (Amrinder Singh Sidhu)

                 Member                                  Member                                  President