BEFORE THE A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT HYDERABAD.

C.C. 55/2006

Between:

Smt. S. Bharathi

W/o. S. Satyanarayana

Age: 50 years,

R/o. 1-4-879/83,

Bholakpur

Musheerabad,Hyderabad                                                                                M/s. Shanku Chakra Construction

Rep. by S. Krishnam Raju

S/o. S. Narayana

R/o. 2-3-647/A/188,

New Premnagar, Amberpet

Hyderabad.

Counsel for the complainant:                  

Counsel for the Opposite Party:

QUORUM:

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.APPA RAO, PRESIDENT.

MONDAY, THE 

ORAL ORDER:

***

This is a complaint filed by the complainant to direct the opposite party to hand over 45% of share as per the terms of development agreement

The case of the complainant in brief is that she is the owner of                               

The notices issued to the opposite party        

The complainant in proof of her case filed her affidavit evidence and Exs. A1 to A6.

It is an undisputed fact that                 

Admittedly, she gave Ex. A3 legal notice Dt. 6.10.2006          flats. The complainant  

In the result the complaint is allowed          

PRESIDENT           

*pnr

 APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

COMPLAINANT                                                    

         DOCUMENTS MARKED FOR COMPLAINANT:

Ex. A1;

Ex. A2;  

Ex. A3; 

Ex. A4;  

Ex. A5;  

Ex. A6;  

                                     Hyderabad.

DOCUMENTS MARKED FOR OPPOSITE PARTY : 

PRESIDENT