Chandigarh

DF-I

CP/182/2010

Mr. Ashok KUmar - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s Seeko Plates & Batteries Plot No. 116 Industrial Area, Phase-II - Opp.Party(s)

18 Mar 2011

ORDER


CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 182 of 2010
1. Mr. Ashok KUmarR/o House No. 2647 Sector-22/C,Chandigarh ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :
For the Respondent :

Dated : 18 Mar 2011
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HELD IN DISTRICT FORUM-I, U.T.

CHANDIGARH

                                                                       

Criminal Complaint No.182 of 2010

 

 

Ashok Kumar

                                                                                                            –   Complainant

                                                            Versus

 

M/s Seeko Plates & Battteries & ors.

 

                                                                                                            - Opposite Parties

 

 

Present:           Complainant in person with counsel Sh.Sanjay Judge, Advocate.

Sh.Sukhwinder Singh, Brother/Representative of OPs.

 

 

Dated, the 18th day of March, 2011.

 

                        ORDER

 

1.                     Parties appeared and the complainant has made statement, which is reproduced as under:-

“Statement of Sh.Ashok Kumar, Complainatn in person with counsel Sh.Sanjay Judge, Advocate for Complainant.

 

I withdraw my execution application as the battery has been replaced by the OPs with new one and I am fully satisfied, without prejudice to my right of fresh warranty”   

 

 

2.                     Keeping in view the above statement, since the complainant has withdrawn the present execution application, without prejudice to his right of fresh warranty, the same is allowed and the present execution application is dismissed as withdrawn.

3.                     Copies of this order free of cost be supplied to the parties. The file be consigned.                          

 

                                                                                                PRESIDING MEMBER

            LOK ADALAT.

 

 

 

                        2nd MEMBER                                               1st MEMBER



DR. MRS MADANJIT KAUR SAHOTA, MEMBER MR. RAJINDER SINGH GILL, PRESIDING MEMBER ,