Andhra Pradesh

StateCommission

FA/1320/06

VENDANTAM RAMAKRISHNA MURTHY - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/S SAHARA HOUSINGFINA CORPORATION LTD - Opp.Party(s)

MR. V.SRINIVASULU

23 Dec 2008

ORDER

 
First Appeal No. FA/1320/06
(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District )
 
1. VENDANTAM RAMAKRISHNA MURTHY
Andhra Pradesh
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. M/S SAHARA HOUSINGFINA CORPORATION LTD
Andhra Pradesh
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

BEFORE THE A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT HYDERABAD.

 

F.A. 1320/2006Hyderabad.

 

Between:

 

1. Vedantam RamaKrishna(Since deceased per LRs)

 

2. V.L.V. Ram Mohan

S/o. Late V. Rama Krishna Murthy

Age: 48 years, R/o.USA

Rep. by his GPA

V. Ram Prasad (Complainant No. 4)

 

3. Smt. M. V. Rajeswari

W/o. M. Rama Murthy &

D/o. Late V. Rama Krishna Murthy

Age: 45 years, Plot No. 28

Siripuri Colony, Karkhana

Secunderabad-500 015.

 

4. V. Ram Prasad

S/o. Late V. Rama Krishna Murthy

Age: 41 years, Fat No. 101G

C.M.R. Residency, PVN Colony

New Mirjalaguda

Malkajigiri-500 047

Ranga Reddy Dist.                                                           

1. M/s. Sahara Housingfina Corporation Ltd.,

Sahara

Saifabad, Hyderabad-500 004.

Rep. by its Regional Business Head

 

2. M/s. Sahara Housingfina Corporation Ltd.,

Regd. & Corporate Office situate at

SaharaIndia 

Shakespeare, Sarai

Kolkatta-700 071.

Rep. by its Chairman/M.D.Opposite Parties

                                     

Counsel for the Appellants:                       

Counsel for the Respondents:

 

QUORUM:

 

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.APPA RAO, PRESIDENT.

                                                                   

 

TUESDAY, THE 

 

ORAL ORDER:

***

 

 

         

             

                to him till      Rs. 1,250/- towards conversion fee.            compensation of Rs. 25,000/- and to pay difference of interest of Rs. 6,888/- together with costs of Rs. 3,000/-.

 

 

                       

 

           

               They ought not to have kept the documents for a period of 12 months,      

 

 

 

                   

 

         

 

 

                 

 

         

 

 

 

The Dist. Forum after considering their respective contentions opined that the complainant had to pay    awarded Rs. 15,000/- towards compensation  

 

As per the orders   

 

It is not in dispute that    

 

The complainant by his letter Dt. 30.9.2003 informed that he was not due any amount towards EMI, 

 

A perusal of the record shows that the complainant had paid Rs. 1,250/- towards conversion fee  

 

 

 

 

The complainant sent                          

 

The Dist. Forum after considering the fact      

 

 He relied a decision in     Awarding a particular amount of compensation         

 

          

 

 

 

 

         

         Dt. 23. 12. 2008.

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.