Andhra Pradesh

StateCommission

FA/1662/08

MR.K.SATHEESH - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/S S P R Y SYSTEMS - Opp.Party(s)

MOHD. KHASIM

12 Jun 2009

ORDER

 
First Appeal No. FA/1662/08
(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District Visakhapatnam-II)
 
1. MR.K.SATHEESH
R/O 16-2-742 F/4/2, ASMANGADH, MALAKPET, HYDERABAD.
HYDERABAD
Andhra Pradesh
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. M/S S P R Y SYSTEMS
M I G - 90, BALAJI NAGAR, APHB COLONY, KUKATPALLY, HYDERABAD-500 072.
HYDERABAD
Andhra Pradesh
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONABLE MR. SRI R. LAXMI NARASIMHA RAO PRESIDING MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER
BEFORE THE ADDITIONAL BENCH OF A.P.STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION:HYDERABAD.

 

FA.No.1662/2008 against  C.C.No.453/2008, District Forum-III, HYDERABAD.

 

Between:

 

Mr.K.Satheesh, S/o.K.Raj, aged about

43 years, Occ:Trainer, Hyderabad

Race Club,

R/o.16-2-742 F/4/2,

Asmangadh, Malakpet, Hyderabad.                                   ..Appellant/Complainant

 

            And

 

M/s S P R Y Systems,

MIG 90, Balaji Nagar, APHB Colony

Kukatpally,

Hyderabad 500 072.                                                            Respondent/Opp.party.

 

Counsel for the Appellant: Mr. Mohd.Khasim

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              

Counsel for the Respondent. Respondent appeared in person.

 

QUORUM: SRI SYED ABDULLAH, HON’BLE MEMBER

AND

                            SRI R.LAKSHMINARASIMHA RAO, MEMBER..

     

FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF JUNE,

TWO THOUSAND NINE

 

ORAL ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Syed Abdullah,  Member.)

                                                                                                                                                                                                                        ***

 

 

           A memo has been filed signed by the appellant and his counsel and the  counsel for respondent stating that the matter has been settled out of Commission. In view of the memo the appeal is dismissed as settled out of Commission.  There shall be no order as to costs.

         

                                                                             MEMBER.

 

                                                                               MEMBER.

                                                                     Dt.12-6-2009.    

 
 
[HONABLE MR. SRI R. LAXMI NARASIMHA RAO]
PRESIDING MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.