Karnataka

Bangalore Urban

CC/12/175

Smt Radhika - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s Royal County - Opp.Party(s)

Gandhi Law Chambers

29 May 2012

ORDER

BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM (Principal)
8TH FLOOR, CAUVERY BHAVAN, BWSSB BUILDING, BANGALORE-5600 09.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/12/175
 
1. Smt Radhika
S/o RamReddy,R/a No.1-8-25,ECIL S/o Sri Rama Koti Reddy,R/a No.9/12,vigneshwar Nilaya,12th cross,22nd main,Hanumagirinagar,B'lore-61post,Hyderabad-82
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. M/s Royal County
No.895/1,'SKANDA',14th cross,Mahalkshmai Layout,B'lore-086
2. Sri Bhaskar Reddy
R/at No.1,SriKrishan Avenue,"SHRESTHA",Kanakapura Road,B'lore
3. Sri T Ripunjaya reddy
Sangam Circle ,Jayanagar,B'lore
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

 

COMPLAINTS FILED ON:25.01.2012

DISPOSED ON:29.05.2012  

 

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM AT BANGALORE (URBAN)

  29th DAY OF MAY 2012

 

  PRESENT:-  SRI. B.S. REDDY                    PRESIDENT

                      SRI.A.MUNIYAPPA                     MEMBER               

 

COMPLAINT Nos. 171, 175, 176, 177,

                              178 & 179/2012

       

Complaint no.171/2012

Complainant

 

 

Smt.Kavitha S/o

K.Rajashekar,

Aged about 33 years,

R/at No. C-10, 1st Floor,

Anirudh Plaza,

Laxmipuram,

Near Divya Nursing Home,

Opp.Dr.A.S.Rao Nagar Bus Stop,

Hyderabadh-560 062.

 

Represented by her GPA Holder

Sri.K.Rajashekar S/o

Rama Koti Reddy,

R/at No.9/12,

Vigneshwar Nilaya,

12th Cross, 22nd Main, Hanumagirinagar,

Bangalore-61.

 

Gandhi Law Chambers

OPPOSITE PARTY/S

 

1.   M/s Sai Balaji Relators,

A Partnership Firm,

Office at No.3/1, Tula Plaza,

Gandhi Bazaar,

Basavangudi,

Bangalore-04.

Represented by its Directors.

 

2.   Bhaskar Reddy S/o

Bala Venkata Reddy,

Aged about 48 years,

R/at No.1, Srikrishna Avenue,

“SHRESTHA”,

Doddakallasandra,

Near Macualoy slcod,

Kanakapura Road,

Bangalore.

 

3.   K.Shivaraja Naidu S/o

K.Narayanaswamy Naidu,

R/at No.Flat No.101,

Sapthagiri Residency,

7th Cross, No.188/4,

6th Block, BSK 3rd Stage, Vidyapeetha Main Road, Bangalore-85.

 

     Ex-parte.

 

Complaint no.175/2012

Complainant

 

Smt.Radhika S/o B.Ramireddy,

Aged about 41 years.

R/at No.House No.1-8-25,

North Kamalanagar,

ECIL Post,

Hyderabad-82. 

 

Represented by her GPA Holder

Sri.K.Rajashekar S/o

Rama Koti Reddy,

Aged about 44 years,

R/at No.9/12,

Vigneshwar Nilaya,

12th Cross, 22nd Main, Hanumagirinagar,

Bangalore-61.

 

Gandhi Law Chambers

OPPOSITE PARTY/S

 

1. M/s Royal County,

Registered office at No.895/1,

‘SKANDA’, 14th Cross,

Mahalakshmi Layout,

Bangalore-86,

Represented by its partner Sri.Bhaskar Reddy.

 

2. Bhaskar Reddy S/o

Bala Venkata Reddy,

Aged about 48 years,

R/at No.1, Srikrishna Avenue,

“SHRESTHA”,

Doddakallasandra,

Near Macualoy slcod,

Kanakapura Road,

Bangalore.

 

3. T.Ripunjaya Reddy S/o

Rahava Reddy,

R/a 604, Vaishnavi Paradise,

Sangam Circle,

Jayanagar,

Bangalore.

 

Placed Ex-parte.

Complaint no.176/2012

Complainant

 

 

Kattukolu Rajashekar S/o

Ramakoti Reddy,

Aged about 44 years,

R/a No.9/13,

Vigneshwar Nilaya,

12th Cross, 22nd Main,

Hanumagirinagar,

Bangalore-61.   

 

Gandhi Law Chambers

OPPOSITE PARTY/S

 

1.   Aishwarya Projects,

Township promoters,

No.717, Poornashashi Complex, (above Maruthi Showroom)

2nd Floor, Modi Hospital Road,

2nd Stage, West of Chord Road, Basaveshwaranagar,

Bangalore-86.

Represented by its partner Sri.Bhaskar Reddy.

 

2. Bhaskar Reddy S/o

Bala Venkata Reddy,

Aged about 48 years,

R/at No.1, Srikrishna Avenue,

“SHRESTHA”,

Doddakallasandra,

Near Macualoy slcod,

Kanakapura Road,

Bangalore.

 

3. T.Ripunjaya Reddy S/o

Rahava Reddy,

R/a 604, Vaishnavi Paradise,

Sangam Circle,

Jayanagar,

Bangalore.

 

Placed Ex-parte.

 

Complaint no.177/2012

Complainant

 

 

Dr.P.S.Reddy S/o

P.V.N.Reddy,

Aged about 55 years,

R/a 3-1-73, Near Water Tank,

Vidyanagar Colony,

Thirupathi-2,

Andrapradesh.

 

Represented by her GPA Holder K.Rajashekar S/o

Rama Koti Reddy,

R/a No.9/12,

Vigneshwar Nilaya,

12th Cross, 22nd Main, Hanumagirinagar,

Bangalore-61.  

 

Gandhi Law Chambers

OPPOSITE PARTY/S

 

1.   M/s Sai Balaji Relators,

A Partnership Firm,

Office at No.3/1,

Tula Plaza,

Gandhi Bazaar,

Basavangudi,

Bangalore-04.

Represented by its Directors.

 

2.   Bhaskar Reddy S/o

Bala Venkata Reddy,

Aged about 48 years,

R/at No.1, Srikrishna Avenue,

“SHRESTHA”, Doddakallasandra,

Near Macualoy slcod,

Kanakapura Road,

Bangalore.

 

3.   K.Shivaraja Naidu S/o

K.Narayanaswamy Naidu,

R/at No.Flat No.101,

Sapthagiri Residency,

7th Cross, No.188/4,

6th Block, BSK 3rd Stage, Vidyapeetha Main Road, Bangalore-85.

 

    Ex-parte.

 

Complaint no.178/2012

Complainant

 

 

Smt.Kavitha S/o

K.Rajashekar,

Aged about 33 years,

R/at No. C-10, 1st Floor,

Anirudh Plaza,

Laxmipuram,

Near Divya Nursing Home,

Opp.Dr.A.S.Rao Nagar Bus Stop,

Hyderabadh-560 062.

 

Represented by her GPA Holder

Sri.K.Rajashekar S/o

Rama Koti Reddy,

R/at No.9/12,

Vigneshwar Nilaya,

12th Cross, 22nd Main, Hanumagirinagar,

Bangalore-61.

 

Gandhi Law Chambers

OPPOSITE PARTY/S

 

1. M/s Royal County,

Registered office at No.895/1,

‘SKANDA’, 14th Cross,

Mahalakshmi Layout,

Bangalore-86,

Represented by its partner Sri.Bhaskar Reddy.

 

2. Bhaskar Reddy S/o

Bala Venkata Reddy,

Aged about 48 years,

R/at No.1, Srikrishna Avenue,

“SHRESTHA”, Doddakallasandra,

Near Macualoy slcod,

Kanakapura Road,

Bangalore.

 

3. T.Ripunjaya Reddy S/o

Rahava Reddy,

R/a 604, Vaishnavi Paradise,

Sangam Circle,

Jayanagar,

Bangalore.

 

Placed Ex-parte.

Complaint no.179/2012

Complainant

 

 

Dr.P.Sreedhar Reddy

S/o Dr.P.Konda Reddy,

Aged about 47 years,

R/at 8-5-19,

Vamsee Speciality,

Hospital Opp. State Bank of India,

Sattenapalli, Guntur District, Andrapradesh.

 

Represented by her GPA Holder

Sri.K.Rajashekar S/o

Rama Koti Reddy,

Aged about 44 years,

R/at No.9/12,

Vigneshwar Nilaya,

12th Cross, 22nd Main, Hanumagirinagar,

Bangalore-61.

 

Gandhi Law Chambers

OPPOSITE PARTY/S

 

1.   M/s Sai Balaji Relators,

A Partnership Firm,

Office at No.3/1,

Tula Plaza,

Gandhi Bazaar,

Basavangudi,

Bangalore-04.

Represented by its Directors.

 

2.   Bhaskar Reddy S/o

Bala Venkata Reddy,

Aged about 48 years,

R/at No.1, Srikrishna Avenue,

“SHRESTHA”, Doddakallasandra,

Near Macualoy slcod,

Kanakapura Road,

Bangalore.

 

3.   K.Shivaraja Naidu S/o

K.Narayanaswamy Naidu,

R/at No.Flat No.101,

Sapthagiri Residency,

7th Cross, No.188/4,

6th Block, BSK 3rd Stage, Vidyapeetha Main Road, Bangalore-85.

 

    Ex-parte.

 

 

 

    

COMMON ORDER

SRI. B.S.REDDY, PRESIDENT

 

These complaints are filed U/s. 12 of the Consumer Protection Act of 1986, by the respective complainants through their General Power of Attorney Holder seeking direction against the Opposite Parties (herein after called as O.Ps) to refund the advance amount paid towards sital deposit with interest at 24% p.a. and compensation along with litigation costs on the allegation of deficiency in service.

 

2.   In spite of service of notice, Ops failed to appear, hence placed ex-parte.

 

3.   The Directors of Ops are common in these cases, though the projects are different,  the questions involved and the relief’s claimed being similar, in order to avoid the repetition of facts and multiplicity of reasoning’s all these complaints are stand disposed of by this common order.

 

4.   The complainants in order to substantiate complaint averments got filed affidavits of the General Power of Attorney Holder.

 

5.   Arguments from complainant’s side heard.

 

 

6.We have gone through the complaint averments, the documents produced and affidavit evidence of the Power of Attorney Holder of the complainants.    On the basis of these materials, it becomes clear that these Ops being engaged in the development of residential layouts in and around Bangalore widely published about the various projects of formation of layouts and allotting the sites.    The proposed layouts are at Hosakerihalli, Uttarahalli Hobli, BSK, III Stage, Bangalore South-85. Huyilal Village, Ellaville Hobbles, Mysore Taluk, Mysore District. “Royal County”, Aishwarya Projects residential layout called M/s ‘Aerozonaa’ at Thattamachanahalli Amanikere Village, Bulluhalli Village and Venkatagirikote Village, Vijayapura Hobli, Devanahalli Taluk, Bangalore Rural District.   The complainants being lured away by the wide advertisements, broachers issued booked the sites by paying the part of the sale consideration and Ops have executed the sale agreement deeds and receipts.   The details of the payments made by each of the complainants are as under.

 

 

 

 

Complaint Nos.

Amount paid

with date

Date of Agreement

CC/171/2012

   Rs.2,47,000/-

   03/12/2004

03.12.2004

CC/175/2012

Rs.5,50,000/-

   8/12/2007

   Rs.3,50,000/-

   22/06/2006

Total Rs.9,00,000/-

13/12/2007

CC/176/2012

   Rs.9,00,000/-

   22/04/2006

-

CC/177/2012

   Rs.10,75,000/-

   19/08/2004

19/08/2004

CC/178/2012

    Rs.9,00,000/-

    8/12/2007

13/12/2007

CC/179/2012

    Rs.5,00,000/-

    19/08/2004

19/08/2004

 

Even though the Ops have received substantial amount of sale consideration from these complainants but no efforts made to form any layout and allot the sites.   The complainants came to know that the Ops utilized the amount received from these complainants for the purchase of Agricultural lands but no efforts made to get the conversion of the said lands and formation of any layouts.   Ultimately, the complainants got issued legal notices to Ops demanding to allot the sites or to refund the amounts with interest but the notices were returned unserved as left.    When Ops were not able to form any layout and allot the sites it would have been fair enough on their part to refund the amounts received from these complainants.    The act of Ops neither forming any layouts and allotting the sites nor refunding the amount received amounts to deficiency in service on their part.   There is no reason to disbelieve the unchallenged affidavit evidence of the GPA Holder of the complainants, the documents produced.   The very fact of Ops remaining ex-parte leads to draw inference that Ops are admitting the claim of the complainants.   Taking into consideration of all the facts and circumstances and Ops having utilized the amount received from these complainants, the complainants are entitled for refund of the amount paid with interest at 18% p.a. by way of compensation along with litigation cost of Rs.2,000/- each.   Accordingly, we proceed to pass the following:

 

O R D E R

       

        The complaints filed by the complainants are allowed in part.

 

In complaint No.171/2012 Ops are directed to refund an amount of Rs.2,47,000/- with interest at 18% p.a. from 03/12/2004 till the date of realization and pay litigation cost of Rs.2,000/- to the  complainant.

 

In complaint No.175/2012 Ops are directed to refund an amount of Rs.9,00,000/- with interest at 18% p.a. from the date of respective payments, till the date of realization and pay litigation cost of Rs.2,000/- to the  complainant.

 

In complaint No.176/2012 Ops are directed to refund an amount of Rs.9,00,000/- with interest at 18% p.a. from 22.04.2006 till the date of realization and pay litigation cost of Rs.2,000/- to the  complainant.

 

In complaint No.177/2012 Ops are directed to refund an amount of Rs.10,75,000/- with interest at 18% p.a. from 19.08.2004 till the date of realization and pay litigation cost of Rs.2,000/- to the  complainant.

 

In complaint No.178/2012 Ops are directed to refund an amount of Rs.9,00,000/- with interest at 18% p.a. from 08.12.2007 till the date of realization and pay litigation cost of Rs.2,000/- to the  complainant.

 

In complaint No.179/2012 Ops are directed to refund an amount of Rs.5,00,000/- with interest at 18% p.a. from 19.08.2004 till the date of realization and pay litigation cost of Rs.2,000/- to the  complainant.

 

This order is to be complied within four weeks from the date of its communication.

 

This original order shall be kept in the file of the complaint No.171/2012 and a copy of it shall be placed in other connected files.

 

 Send copy of this order to both the parties free of costs.

 

(Dictated to the Stenographer and typed in the computer and transcribed by her verified and corrected, and then pronounced in the Open Court by us on this the 29th day of MAY-2012.)

 

                                                                                                     

 

MEMBER                                               PRESIDENT

 

 

Cs.

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.