BEFORE THE ADDITIONAL BENCH OF A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION ATHYDERABAD.
FA.No.264/2007 AGAINST C.D.No.265/2006 GUNTUR.
Between:
1. M/s.Lakshmi Motors
Guntur.
2. M/s.Tata Motors Limited,
SuryaTowers, ‘C’ Block
3. M/s.Tata Motors Limited
M/s.Ramanjaneya Traders,
Represented by its Partner,
Mr.Vanukuri Surya Reddy, S/o.Seshi
Reddy, D.No.24-2-47, Charlaparlavari
Street, Patnam Bazar, Guntur-522 003.
Counsel for the Appellant: M/s.Ms.Shireen Sethna Baria
Counsel for the Respondent:-Mr.A.Rajendra Babu
QUORUM: &
SRI K.SATYANAND, MEMBER
FRIDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER,
TWO THOUSAND NINE
(Typed to the dictation of Sri K.Satyanand,Hon’ble Member)
***
st st stst ststndrd stopposite party on 6-9-2006 and handed over the vehicle with meter reading at 38526 km demanding rectification of the defect for which the opposite party replied that it was common for all vehicles.
Hyderabad th
rd
On a consideration of the evidence adduced on behalf of both sides, the District Forum gave findings to the effect that the request of the complainant for the replacement of the vehicle or refund of the cost in lieu thereof was absolutely unreasonable in as much as the vehicle was put to extensive use by the complainant covering 38,000 KM.
allegations of excess engine oil consumption etc., the award of compensation was unjustified. The Forum failed to see that there was no pending problem in the vehicle they added. st
i) Whether the District Forum is justified in granting the relief of Rs.50,000/- etc., as it did?
ii) Whether there are any infirmities in the order of the District Forum calling for interference by this Commission?
i) Rs.5,00,000/- towards loss of the car or replacement of the car
ii) Rs.10,000/- towards compensation for the damages caused to the complainant including mental agony, pain and sufferings besides Rs.1,000/- towards costs of the notice and Rs.25,000/- towards advocate’s fees.
Even while giving
JM
