Haryana

Panchkula

CC/358/2020

PRIYANKA SHARMA. - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/S RADHIKA GENERAL STORE. - Opp.Party(s)

IN PERSON

15 Jul 2021

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PANCHKULA.

                              

Consumer Complaint No.

:

358 of 2020

Date of Institution

:

27.11.2020

Date of Decision

:

15.07.2021

 

Priyanka Sharma daughter of Dr. S.K. Punia, resident of house No.72, Sector-16, Panchkula.

                                                                                  ……...Complainant

          Versus

1.   M/s Radhika General Store, Shop No.48-49, Mini Market, Sector-9 Panchkula through its proprietor Smt. Kavita wife of Shri Raju, Mobile No.8708860637.

2.   Smt. Kavita wife of Shri Raju, Mobile No.8708860637 proprietor M/s Radhika General Store, Shop No.48-49, Mini Market, Sector-9, Panchkula.

 

                          ….….Opposite Parties

Complaint under Section 35 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019

Before:         Shri Satpal, President.

Dr.Pawan Kumar Saini, Member.

                     Dr.Sushma Garg, Member.

 

Present:        Complainant in person alongwith Shri Diwan Sharma, Advocate.

                     Shri Lalit, son/representative of OP No.2 and representative of                         OP No.1.

 

          Today, the case is fixed for amicable settlement between the parties, if any and for filing evidence by the OPs. Shri Lalit, son of Smt. Kavita (representative of OPs No.1 and 2), on the instructions of OP No. 2, by making a separate statement, stated that he has been authorized by his mother Smt. Kavita, to appear and enter into compromise with the complainant on her behalf and on behalf of OP No.1. Today, he has paid an amount of Rs.3550/- as full and final settlement to the complainant, and prayed that present complaint be dismissed in view of the settlement with the Complainant.

          On the other hand, the Complainant by making a separate statement, stated that she has gone through the statement made by the Shri Lalit son of the OP No.2 and agrees with the same, and today, she has received an amount of Rs.3550/- in cash as full and final settlement. Now, nothing is due against the OPs, hence, she withdraws the present complaint, being fully satisfied.

          Heard. In view of the statement made by both the parties, the present Consumer Complaint is hereby dismissed as withdrawn, being fully satisfied.

                     A copy of this order be sent to the parties, free of costs and File be consigned to the record room, after due compliance.

 

Dt.                (Dr.Sushma Garg)           (Dr. Pawan Kumar Saini)                (Satpal)

15.07.2021     Member                          Member                                    President

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.